Category:Start-Class Food and drink articles
Appearance
![]() | This is a maintenance category, used for maintenance of the Wikipedia project. It is not part of the encyclopedia and contains non-article pages, or groups articles by status rather than subject. Do not include this category in content categories. |
![]() | Administrators: Please do not delete this category as empty! This category may be empty occasionally or even most of the time. |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | B | C | Start | Stub | ![]() | List | Category | Disambig | Draft | ![]() | File | Portal | Project | Redirect | Template | NA | ??? |
52 | 2 | 383 | 1,290 | 4,752 | 16,119 | 13,748 | 4 | 969 | 7,986 | 162 | 195 | 139 | 3,009 | 614 | 387 | 3,402 | 980 | 225 | 2,025 |
- Project home - WikiProject Food and drink
This page categorizes pages using assessment grades, through built-in transclusion from {{WikiProject Food and Drink}}.
Information on Grading Scheme
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | Cleopatra (as of June 2018) |
![]() |
The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible. | List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018) |
![]() |
The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014) |
![]() |
The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | Psychology (as of January 2024) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | Wing (as of June 2018) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | Ball (as of September 2014) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | Lineage (anthropology) (as of December 2014) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of literary movements |
For a list of articles so classified, see the Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Food and drink articles by quality page (both quality and importance are reflected in the table).
Pages in category "Start-Class Food and drink articles"
The following 200 pages are in this category, out of approximately 16,119 total. This list may not reflect recent changes.
(previous page) (next page)N
- Talk:Naan
- Talk:Naan qalia
- Talk:Nabadwip-er lal doi
- Talk:Nabak-kimchi
- Talk:Nacatamal
- Talk:Nacheaux
- Talk:Nacho Borracho
- Talk:Nadia G's Bitchin' Kitchen
- Talk:Nadiya Bakes
- Talk:Nadiya's Asian Odyssey
- Talk:Nadiya's British Food Adventure
- Talk:Nadiya's Family Favourites
- Talk:Nădlac sausage
- Talk:Naengmyeon
- Talk:Naga Morich
- Talk:Nagoya cuisine
- Talk:Carrie Nahabedian
- Talk:Nahoum & Sons
- Talk:Nail Brewing
- Talk:Nairobi Coffee Exchange
- Talk:Naju Gomtang Hayanjib
- Talk:Shota Nakajima
- Talk:Naked Food
- Talk:Nakji-bokkeum
- Talk:Nakshi Pitha
- Talk:Nakumatt
- Talk:Nam chim
- Talk:Nam Dok Mai
- Talk:Nam Kee
- Talk:Nam khao
- Talk:Nam ngiao
- Talk:Nam phrik long ruea
- Talk:Nam tok (food)
- Talk:Nambarrie
- Talk:Namibia Breweries Limited
- Talk:Namul
- Talk:Nanaimo bar
- Talk:Nangchang Jar soup
- Talk:Nankin Cafe
- Talk:Nantucket Nectars
- Talk:Napa Declaration on Place
- Talk:Naparbier
- Talk:Napery
- Talk:Napkin
- Talk:Naples Winter Wine Festival
- Talk:Napolact
- Talk:Napoleon House
- Talk:Naporitan
- Talk:Narbonne Flour Mill
- Talk:Naringin
- Talk:Narragansett Brewing Company
- Talk:Nasalo
- Talk:Nash Finch Company
- Talk:Jonell Nash
- Talk:Nasi ambeng
- Talk:Nasi bogana
- Talk:Nasi campur
- Talk:Nasi goreng pattaya
- Talk:Nasi jinggo
- Talk:Nasi kandar
- Talk:Nasi kapau
- Talk:Nasi katok
- Talk:Nasi kebuli
- Talk:Nasi kerabu
- Talk:Nasi kucing
- Talk:Nasi kuning
- Talk:Nasi minyak
- Talk:Nasi padang
- Talk:Nasi tutug oncom
- Talk:Nasi uduk
- Talk:Nasi ulam
- Talk:Nata de coco
- Talk:Nata de piña
- Talk:Natamycin
- Talk:Nate 'n Al of Beverly Hills
- Talk:Natillas
- Talk:Nation's Giant Hamburgers
- Talk:National Bakery School
- Talk:National Beef Association
- Talk:National Bohemian
- Talk:National Centre for Food Manufacturing
- Talk:National Cherry Festival
- Talk:National Cocoa and Coffee Board
- Talk:National Coffee Association
- Talk:National Coney Island
- Talk:National Drug Authority
- Talk:National Food Chain Safety Office
- Talk:National Foods Limited
- Talk:National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management
- Talk:National Inventory of Historic Pub Interiors
- Talk:National Kitchens
- Talk:National Lamb Day
- Talk:National Liberal Club
- Talk:National Mortgage and Agency Company of New Zealand
- Talk:National Museum of Tequila
- Talk:National Mustard Museum
- Talk:National Organic Program
- Talk:National Pie Day
- Talk:National Press Club (United States)
- Talk:National Registry of Food Safety Professionals
- Talk:National Supermarkets
- Talk:National Wine Centre of Australia
- Talk:Natrona Bottling Company
- Talk:Nattō
- Talk:Natural Ice Cream
- Talk:Natural wine
- Talk:Nature's Basket
- Talk:Naturex
- Talk:Naughty Nuri's
- Talk:Naval Club
- Talk:Navarin (food)
- Talk:Navarino Icons
- Talk:Navarre (restaurant)
- Talk:Navel orange
- Talk:Navy bean
- Talk:Naya Waters
- Talk:Christopher Naylor (chef)
- Talk:Nazirabazar
- Talk:Nc'nean distillery
- Talk:Neapolitan flip coffee pot
- Talk:Neapolitan ice cream
- Talk:Neapolitan pizza
- Talk:Neapolitan ragù
- Talk:Neapolitan sauce
- Talk:Nectar
- Talk:Nectar source
- Talk:Neenish tart
- Talk:Neer dosa
- Talk:Negative-calorie food
- Talk:Negrita (rum)
- Talk:Negus (drink)
- Talk:Neknominate
- Talk:Nelson Brewing Company
- Talk:Nelson Brothers Limited
- Talk:Alexis Nikole Nelson
- Talk:Ann Nelson (coach operator)
- Talk:Candace Nelson
- Talk:Miriam E. Nelson
- Talk:Thérèse Nelson
- Talk:Nelson's Ice Cream
- Talk:Nem chua rán
- Talk:Nem nướng
- Talk:Neohesperidin dihydrochalcone
- Talk:Neotame
- Talk:Neptune Inn, Ipswich
- Talk:Neptune Oyster
- Talk:Neptune's Net
- Talk:Nerada Tea
- Talk:Nerds (candy)
- Talk:Nergård AS
- Talk:Nerol
- Talk:Neroli
- Talk:Nescafé
- Talk:Nesquik
- Talk:Nestlé Bear Brand
- Talk:Nestlé Deutschland
- Talk:Nestlé Milk Chocolate
- Talk:Nestlé Tutbury
- Talk:Nestlé Waters
- Talk:Henri Nestlé
- Talk:Nettle soup
- Talk:Network for Capacity Development in Nutrition
- Talk:Neuhaus (chocolatier)
- Talk:Neula
- Talk:Liz Neumark
- Talk:Never have I ever
- Talk:NeverSeconds
- Talk:New Bay Diner Restaurant
- Talk:New Cascadia Traditional
- Talk:New Cavendish Club
- Talk:New Club, Edinburgh
- Talk:New Copper Penny
- Talk:New England boiled dinner
- Talk:New England Great Chowder Cook-Off
- Talk:New Gallery (London)
- Talk:New Haven–style pizza
- Talk:New Ho King
- Talk:New Holland Brewing Company
- Talk:New Jersey dairy industry
- Talk:New Mexican cuisine
- Talk:New Nordic Cuisine
- Talk:New Orleans hot sausage
- Talk:New Scandinavian Cooking
- Talk:New world whisky
- Talk:New York dairy industry
- Talk:New York Food Truck Association
- Talk:New York Pizza
- Talk:New York–style pizza
- Talk:New Zealand Chinese cuisine
- Talk:New Zealand Food Safety
- Talk:New Zealand grapefruit
- Talk:Newar cuisine
- Talk:NEWater
- Talk:Newby's
- Talk:Newcomb's Ranch
- Talk:Newfoundland Chocolate Company
- Talk:Newfoundland Margarine Company
- Talk:Gemma Newman
- Talk:Lenore Newman
- Talk:Newman's Own