Category talk:Coca-Cola

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconGeorgia (U.S. state) Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconFood and drink: Beverages Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Related taskforces:
Taskforce icon
This category is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Tab[edit]

I don't know what the criteria are here, but I'm adding Tab, as it was important in the company's history, even though it is also one of its brands. ProhibitOnions 01:53, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Generally speaking, I only put the Coke brands under that category so we don't have redundant lists. I made an exception with New Coke though since much of the article discussed corporate and cultural impact on the company as a whole.RevelationDirect (talk) 01:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revising sub-cats[edit]

I'm significantly reworking the categories under this one to better organize the items. The end result will be more sub-cats but less loose articles under the cat. Please double-check my work and let me know if we can better group the articlesRevelationDirect (talk) 01:41, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]