This category is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
Dawnleelynn: I'm wondering if the rodeos here should move over to the various "Rodeo by county" categories -- United States, Canada, etc... the question being if the category should be diffused or non-diffused... (I'm leaning to the former...) Montanabw(talk) 21:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Montanabw I roamed through those pages. There are halls of fame, museums, people pages sprinkled through those categories. Just like Rodeo used to be until we cleared it out (well, it still has a few stragglers.) The US rodeo page even has the ProRodeo Hall of Fame inductees sub-category. I keep seeing it everywhere I go. Also, there is a list of rodeos article in this category, is that supposed to be kept up with any particular category? If we clean up the country categories so they just contain rodeos then I could see moving these pages here to there. Let me know if this makes sense and if this is what you want to do? dawnleelynn(talk) 22:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What it is, is a great big PITA (pain in the ---). I suspect it will just be one of those things where one moves a half-dozen each WP "day" and eventually it gets done. I wish that WP had the "cat-a-lot" feature that Commons does, where you can move categories without going into the individual articles (or maybe there IS such a widget and I haven't found it yet...) My thinking is that List of rodeos could move to the main Rodeo category and the rest could, most likely, be diffused. Stuff like Indian rodeo and such could move to either the main cat or(perhaps better) to the rodeo series category... which we could use to include many of the various "circuits" and specialty things. Montanabw(talk) 15:55, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Montanabw (talk·contribs) There is a way to rename categories that I believe changes the articles too. I had tried to tell this to karanacs but she ignored me. See WP:CFDS. It might not be helpful for this situation, I am not sure. But I'd like to know if you are generally aware of this process where you submit your category and it is discussed and then processed by others. If it is agreed upon, the category is renamed (or merged). I can't imagine such a process that goes into a discussion if it was only doing a move. If it is not useful here, it worth knowing about if it does what I think, for the future. dawnleelynn(talk) 16:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I"m actually doing a CfD on something unrelated. The reason I hesitate to do these in the middle of a category reorganization is because people with no understanding of the situation can weigh in and this can create ... confusion. I don't call those places the "drahmahz boardz" for nothing... ;-) Montanabw(talk) 22:32, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Montanabw (talk·contribs) Ok, I understand. It would probably only be something to undertake in a sole category with a huge number of articles that was not involved in any other category changes at the time then, I guess. Ok thanks! I always get the good advice from you. dawnleelynn(talk) 22:43, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
