This category is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this category, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Is there a reason why the first four articles listed aren't part of the alphabetical sorting? That is, why aren't Alys McKey Bryant, Iris Calderhead, Mary Howgill, and Susanna Freeborn listed in the B, C, H, and F section, respectively? It seems kind of arbitrary. I think the only time I've seen articles listed separately from the main alphabetical list is when they start with a number or symbol or something; then again, I'm pretty new to Wikipedia, so is there some convention or standard I'm unaware of? EDIT: Also, the same applies to the list of subcategories; shouldn't Women's history and Women by period be included in the alphabetical listing? GreatBigDot (talk) 02:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, so after actually looking at the source for the article, it looks like the lists are auto-generated by Wikipedia. The reason why some articles are out of place is that when adding the category flag, they got piped to the empty string, which I guess sorts first lexicographically. The question, then, is why some articles are set in such a manner; is it a mistake, or were they intentionally set to appear at the top of all categories they appear in? Either way, it's a question that belongs on those articles, not on this one. Oops! GreatBigDot (talk) 02:21, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
