Draft talk:Nick Fuentes

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nick Fuentes redirect.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Podcasting

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Delete, 18 November 2019, see discussion.
Delete, 6 January 2019, see discussion.

Notes & Article Organization

Looks like a bunch of notes have been put in the draft article. I know it's a draft, but it's probably best to talk about citations or such in the talk page, rather than the main article. AKA Casey Rollins Talk With Casey 02:15, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added citations. More needed. organization is also needed as well as references to his organized harassment of Turning Point USA events and Dan Crenshaw Editorman232 (talk) 06:36, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

First request by Nate Hooper

Okay, Nick has recently become much more well known. He has grown by 10k Subscribers in the last month and he's all they were talking about in the most recent tpusa conference. He is currently one of the most prominent personalities on the pro-American Right, second, perhaps only, to Anne Coulter. Just consider his rise in the past month and his trajectory. He is not a random white supremacist. The more you ignore him, the more powerful he becomes. Nate Hooper (talk) 08:29, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate, Wikipedia is not here to dox Nazi's. If it makes you feel better, it's good that this fella is not notable.

"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about" - Oscar Wilde Bacondrum (talk) 23:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nate, stop trying to make Wikipedia legitimate. Let Wikipedia continue to discredit itself. If you want to write about Nick F., use a different platform. 71.82.73.37 (talk) 18:48, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Nick's article

Hi, Gbawden. Here are some links to articles about him: Vice: [1] Miami times: [2] Right wing watch: [3] The daily beast: [4] Time: [5] Chicago trubune: [6] Boston globe: [7] Mother Jones: [8] and Huffington post: [9], just to name a few Thanks for your consideration

@Gbawden:, I posted this on your page at first, but I found this page, so it's here now.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nate Hooper (talk • contribs) 23:05, October 31, 2019 (UTC)

His own youtube station? The guy is an unknown quantity. Considering he has all but no public profile, this looks like an effort to promote the subject. 23:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Bacondrum (talk)

Now there's the MTV interview, so there's another source. I say resubmit the article, there's more than enough to keep it this time. — Confession0791 ^talk 05:21, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment of Notability

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Fuentes (2nd nomination).

This draft should not be resubmitted except via Deletion Review. There has been a discussion of notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:35, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

He surely beats the description of notability. He has been referenced in many mainstream media articles including Vox Huffington Post Mother Jones National Review Infowars Vice the Boston Globe The Daily Beast reason.com The Washington Post and others. He's also been mentioned by Congressman Jim Crenshaw and by right-wing speaker Ben Shapiro and Charlie Kir

cuz YouTube channel has 60k followers and he is the leader of the alt right movement replacing Richard Spencer Editorman232 (talk) 06:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Hey, most people arguing for his notability here are biased in his favour, since they are part of his zoomer Nazi fanbase, but I, who am positively biased AGAINST him, being a Communist trans woman, still think he’s probably pretty notable. Spanish Wikipedia has an article on him (https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nick_Fuentes). And I know that ‘but they do it too’ isn’t a legitimate argument, I’m not making that argument, I’m not saying ‘Spanish Wikipedia has it so therefore so should we’, I’m saying ‘Spanish Wikipedia has it so we should check the sources that Spanish Wikipedia uses to see if those sources qualify him for an article over here’. --StrexcorpEmployee (talk) 16:41, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]