Lexell's Comet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
D/1770 L1 (Lexell)
Discovery
Discovered by Charles Messier
Discovery date June 14, 1770[1]
Alternative
designations
1770 I,
P/Lexell,
Lexell's Comet
Orbital characteristics A
Epoch 1770-Aug-14
(JD 2367764.5)[2]
Perihelion 0.6746 ± 0.003 (before Jupiter encounter of 1779)
Eccentricity 0.7856 ± 0.0013
Inclination 1.550 ± 0.004°
Node 134.50 ± 0.12
Peri 224.98 ± 0.12
Dimensions ~4-30 km
Last perihelion August 14, 1770
Next perihelion unknown/Lost

D/1770 L1, popularly known as Lexell's Comet after its orbit computer Anders Johan Lexell, was a comet discovered by astronomer Charles Messier in June 1770.[note 1] It is notable for having passed closer to Earth than any other comet in recorded history, approaching to a distance of only 0.015 astronomical units (2,200,000 km; 1,400,000 mi).[1][3][4] The comet has not been seen since 1770 and is considered a lost comet.

Lexell's Comet's 1770 passing still holds the record of closest observed approach of Earth by a comet.[4] However, if approaches deduced from orbit calculations are included, it has been beaten by a small sungrazing comet, P/1999 J6 (SOHO), which passed even closer at about 0.012 AU (1,800,000 km; 1,100,000 mi) from Earth on June 12, 1999,[5] albeit unobserved.[6] Its estimated diameter was 48 meters in 1999 and 23 meters before its 2004 return.[7]

Discovery[edit]

Charles Messier, who discovered Lexell's Comet

The comet was discovered on June 14, 1770, in the constellation Sagittarius by Messier, who had just completed an observation of Jupiter and was examining several nebulae.[1] At this time it was very faint, but his observations over the course of the next few days showed that it rapidly grew in size, its coma reaching 27 arcminutes across by June 24: by this time it was of magnitude +2. The comet was also noted by several other astronomers.

The comet was observed in Japan. Surviving records identify it as an astronomical and historical phenomenon.[8]

It was observed in the Hejaz in Safar 1184 AH (June 1770), where some believed it to be the comet predicted by the poet al-Fasi, portending future events.[9][10]

Close approach to Earth[edit]

On July 1, 1770, the comet passed 0.015 astronomical units from Earth,[4] or approximately 6 times the radius of the Moon's orbit. Charles Messier measured the coma as 2° 23' across, around four times the apparent angular size of the Moon. An English astronomer at the time noted the comet crossing over 42° of sky in 24 hours; he described the nucleus as being as large as Jupiter, "surrounded with a coma of silver light, the brightest part of which was as large as the moon's orb".[1]

Messier was the last astronomer to observe the comet as it moved away from the Sun, on October 3, 1770.[1]

Orbit[edit]

Scientists at the time largely believed that comets originated outside the solar system, and therefore initial attempts to model the comet's orbit assumed a parabolic trajectory, which indicated a perihelion date (the date of the closest approach to the Sun) of August 9–10.[11] When it turned out that the parabolic solution was not a good fit to the comet's orbit, Anders Johan Lexell suggested that the comet followed an elliptical orbit. His calculations, made over a period of several years, gave a perihelion of August 13–14 and an orbital period of 5.58 years.[1] Lexell also noted that, despite this short-period orbit, by far the shortest known at the time, the comet was unlikely to have been seen previously because its orbit had been radically altered in 1767 by the gravitational forces of Jupiter.[12] It is, therefore, the earliest identified Jupiter family comet (as well as the first known near-Earth object).[13]

The comet was never seen again. Lexell, after conducting further work in cooperation with Pierre-Simon Laplace, argued that a subsequent interaction with Jupiter in 1779 had further perturbed its orbit, either placing it too far from Earth to be seen or perhaps ejecting it from the Solar System altogether.[14] The comet likely no longer approaches any closer to the Sun than Jupiter's orbit.[13]

Although Comet Lexell was never seen again, it remained interesting to astronomers. The Paris Academy of Sciences offered a prize for an investigation into the orbit of the comet. Johann Karl Burckhardt won in 1801, and confirmed the calculations of Lexell. He calculated that the 1779 close approach to Jupiter drastically altered its orbit and left it with a perihelion of 3.33 AU.[15] In the 1840s, Urbain Le Verrier carried out further work on the comet's orbit and demonstrated that despite potentially approaching Jupiter as close as three and a half radii from the planet's centre the comet could never have become a satellite of Jupiter.[14] He showed that after the second encounter with Jupiter many different trajectories were possible, given the uncertainties of the observations, and the comet could even have been ejected from the Solar System. This foreshadowed the modern scientific idea of chaos.[14]

Lexell's work on the orbit of the comet is considered to be the beginning of modern understanding of orbit determination.[16]

2018 recalculation[edit]

In a 2018 paper, Quan-Zhi Ye et al. used recorded observations of the comet to recalculate the orbit, finding Le Verrier's 1844 calculations to be highly accurate. They simulated the orbit forwards to the year 2000, finding that 98% of possible orbits remained orbiting the Sun, 85% with a perihelion nearer than the asteroid belt, and 40% crossing Earth's orbit. The numbers remain consistent even when including non-gravitational parameters caused by pressures from a comet's jets.[2]

Based on its apparent brightness in 1770, they estimate the comet to be between 4 and 50 kilometers in diameter, most likely less than 30. Additionally, based on a lack of meteor showers, they suggest that the comet may have ceased major activity before 1800 AD.[2]

Identification[edit]

The aforementioned 2018 paper also attempted to identify if any discovered object may be a remnant of Lexell's comet. With an assumed size of >4 kilometers, it is highly unlikely that this comet would remain in the inner solar system and be undiscovered. Most new asteroids discovered even in the asteroid belt (as of 2018) are only 1–4 kilometers across. If Lexell's comet remains in the inner Solar System, it would most likely be an unidentified asteroid. The paper identified 4 potential asteroids which could be related: 2010 JL33 (99.2% chance), 1999 XK136 (74% chance), 2011 LJ1 (0.2% chance), and 2001 YV3 (~0% chance).[2]

They find that 2010 JL33 is very likely to be a remnant of Lexell's comet, although due to a number of close approaches with Jupiter as well as uncertain non-gravitational parameters, a definite link cannot be made.[2]

Notes[edit]

Footnotes
  1. ^ Other comets named after their orbit computer, rather than discoverer, are 27P/Crommelin, 2P/Encke and 1P/Halley – Halley's Comet.
Citations
  1. ^ a b c d e f Kronk, G. Cometography: D/1770 L1 (Lexell), accessed November 20, 2008.
  2. ^ a b c d e Ye, Quan-Zhi; Wiegert, Paul A.; Hui, Man-To (24 February 2018). "Finding Long Lost Lexell's Comet: The Fate of the First Discovered Near-Earth Object". arXiv:1802.08904Freely accessible [astro-ph.EP]. 
  3. ^ Kronk, G. The Closest Approaches of Comets to Earth, accessed 20 November 20, 2008. It was thought that C/1491 B1 may have approached even closer on February 20, 1491, but its orbit was retracted in 2002 due to a misunderstanding of the records. See Approximate Orbits of Ancient and Medieval Comets: 3. Remarks and Discussion
  4. ^ a b c "Closest Approaches to the Earth by Comets". Minor Planet Center. Retrieved 2018-01-10. 
  5. ^ "JPL Close-Approach Data: P/1999 J6 (SOHO)" (2010-04-22 last obs (arc=10.9 yr; JFC)). Retrieved 2012-06-28. 
  6. ^ Sekanina, Zdenek; Chodas, Paul W. (December 2005). "Origin of the Marsden and Kracht Groups of Sunskirting Comets. I. Association with Comet 96P/Machholz and Its Interplanetary Complex" (PDF). The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 151 (2): 551–586. Bibcode:2005ApJS..161..551S. doi:10.1086/497374. Retrieved 2018-01-11. 
  7. ^ Studies of SOHO Comets dissertation by Matthew M. Knight, page 167)
  8. ^ Hall, John. (1955). Tanuma Okitsugu, 1719–1788, p. 120.
  9. ^ Daḥlan, Aḥmad Zaynī (2007) [1887/1888]. Khulāṣat al-kalām fī bayān umarā’ al-Balad al-Ḥarām خلاصة الكلام في بيان أمراء البلد الحرام (in Arabic). Dār Arḍ al-Ḥaramayn. pp. 274–276. 
  10. ^ Scheltema, J. F. (1917). "Arabs and Turks". Journal of the American Oriental Society. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. 37: 156. 
  11. ^ Tofigh Heidarzadeh (2008). A History of Physical Theories of Comets, From Aristotle to Whipple. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 196-197. ISBN 1402083238. 
  12. ^ Leverington, D. Babylon to Voyager and Beyond: A History of Planetary Astronomy, Cambridge University Press, 2003, p.193
  13. ^ a b Valsecchi, G. 'A comet heading towards Earth: the first NEO', in Tumbling Stone, Issue 2, accessed November 21, 2008
  14. ^ a b c Valsecchi, G. 'Le Verrier's computations and the concept of Chaos', in Tumbling Stone, Issue 3, accessed February 11, 2011
  15. ^ Barnard, E. E. (January 25, 1890). "Probable Return of Lexell's Comet". 2 (6): 21–24. Retrieved 2018-01-11. 
  16. ^ Valsecchi, G. '236 Years Ago...' in Near Earth Objects, Our Celestial Neighbors: Opportunity and Risk : Proceedings of the 236th Symposium of the International Astronomical Union, Cambridge University Press, 2006, xvii–xviii

References[edit]

External links[edit]