Talk:John Call Cook: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:09, 23 April 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Call Cook article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography Unassessed

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Articles for creation C‑class

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted on 28 March 2013 by reviewer Martijn Hoekstra (talk · contribs).

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies Unassessed

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

CACook7 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 {{WikiProject Physics|bio=yes}}
 {{Connected contributor|CACook7|editedhere=yes|declared=}}
-== Empty section ==
-Understand. In fact there are many improvements that I could make to this article, although first we must resolve some unjustifiable changes which editor Huon has made to disambigs for this page. This matter is currently under appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation and board. If every action I take is to be reversed by Huon (apparently out of vindictiveness, as his changes are not rational) there is no use in furthering this article. [[User:CACook7|CACook7]] ([[User talk:CACook7|talk]]) 21:42, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
-:I've moved the above comment on the empty [[John Call Cook#Professional life|Professional life]] section from the article. This talk page is meant for discussions. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 22:27, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
-::Please explain how moving the explanation to the comment of the article's incompleteness, is rational. The article could be much more, that is clear. So either the Empty section bullet should be in Talk (by your logic), or my response should be on the main page responding to the Empty section bullet. As it is, there is no apparent response nor explanation for the Empty section bullet, to the casual reader, when there are very good reasons for the incompleteness. [[User:CACook7|CACook7]] ([[User talk:CACook7|talk]]) 23:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
-:::In moving my explanation for the empty section back to here, I see that Huon still has an appetite for bickering.  Bait declined. This is getting things nowhere. [[User:CACook7|CACook7]] ([[User talk:CACook7|talk]]) 23:41, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
-::::there is no bickering here - talk about pages goes on talk pages, articles go on article pages and ne'er the twain shall meet. That is simply long established practice of wikipedia editors. --[[User:nonsenseferret|''<sub><font color="green" size="1px">nonsense</font></sub>'']] [[User talk:nonsenseferret|<font color="BF1BE0" size="1px">ferret</font>]] 23:45, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
-:::::Maintenance tags are meant to point out issues with the article that readers may want to fix. The section obviously is empty; what other explanation should be given for the tag? Since most readers don't check talk pages, there would be little use in adding the maintenance tags here instead of to the article itself. See [[WP:Template messages/Cleanup]] for background information on such messages. That page says they should be added to the article proper, and the tag was automatically added by a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Call_Cook&diff=549368474&oldid=547896389 bot]. ''Comments'' on maintenance tags, however, should not be added to the article - they, like all discussions about the article, should be on the talk page. See the [[WP:Talk page guidelines|talk page guidelines]] for details. If, for example, someone replied to your comment at the article, pointed out sources, and a debate about the best sources ensued, that would seriously disrupt the article. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 00:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)