Talk:2001 German Grand Prix

2001 German Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: July 6, 2015. (Reviewed version).

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2001 German Grand Prix article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Formula One Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.

View the task list
Discuss the project
Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2001 German Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 09:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC) On it. Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Well, what can I say? An article of epic scope on a Formula One Grand Prix in 2001, and once again great work done by Z105space. There are just some very minor things I would like to address:

I don't really know about galeforcef1.com as a reliable source. Since the website does not exist anymore, I find it hard to evaluate it. Maybe you can tell me more about it?
- GaleForceF1.com was the host of AtlasF1 (now part of Autosport) and the now defunct official website of Pacific Grand Prix. It is considered a reliable source by WP:MOTOR/SOURCES despite it being shut down.

Thanks for clearing that up!

Race: Two problems with the whole Minardi pre-start business. 1) The sentence you wrote makes little sense to me. Why did Marques use Alonso's car when it was on fire? Seems like a pretty stupid idea... 2) and more importantly, the source you give does not tell the story like you do, so I must assume original research. Please clarify this section.
- I have reworded that Alonso's car was repaired and Marques drove that car. The source, from GrandPrix.com, is also considered reliable as it is written by Joe Saward, the former editor of Autosport who has an official Formula One press pass.

I rewatched the start of the race, and it appears that you are right when you describe what happened. But the source you give does not describe it like that. I never doubted GrandPrix.com as a reliable source, just that the content does not fit to what you write. I have reworded it to fit the source. If you find another, more detailed source, feel free to change it back.

Race: There is no mention of Montoya's retirement!
- Added

That is about all I can find. Please look into the issues, you have the usual seven days, but I am confident we can bring this review to a pass in less time than that. Cheers, Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Zwerg Nase: The issues raised have been rectified. I hope I have clarified the sources you questioned. Z105space (talk) 20:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Z105space: With the changes made, I can give this a pass. Congratulations :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:52, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]