Talk:2005 Quran desecration controversy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject United States (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Islam (Rated Start-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 ???  This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
 


Dead link 3[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

This was apparently only a copy from the original SOUTHCOM press release. It's gone, but the editor archived the link, and that still works. If nobody else gets to it, I'll move the links around later when I have time. -- Randy2063 (talk) 04:25, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 4[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

It's okay. Same situation as in Dead link 3 above. -- Randy2063 (talk) 04:25, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 5[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

It's okay. Same as in Dead link 3 and Dead link 4. -- Randy2063 (talk) 04:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 11[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:36, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Fixed this one. It's "The Experiment" by Jane Mayer. -- Randy2063 (talk) 02:57, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 12[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:46, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Fixed -- Randy2063 (talk) 03:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion. - GTBacchus(talk) 23:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC)


2005 Qur'an desecration controversy2005 Quran desecration controversy

Quran moves
All speedily moved. NW (Talk) 21:48, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
  • I tried moving several myself and they were immovable. I'm hoping some admin will see this and swoop in. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 05:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
  • I see that all their names contain "Qur'an", but please what needs to be replaced by what in each name? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:46, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Response The main article and category are entitled "Quran" (sans apostrophe.) Thanks for writing me. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 06:33, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Some of the names are Arabic names for people or things, and there the apostrophe (representing glottal stop/hamza) should be present for linguistic correctness. In others the word "Qur'an" is used as English in an English name, and in those uses there is opinion for omitting the apostrophe.
    Many of the above entries are categories, which after decision about moving has been reached, should be handled in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:54, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Consistency I have already removed some proper titles of books or institutions like King Fahd Complex for the Printing of the Holy Qur'an. Most of these (if not all) use the term generically and should follow whatever style the main article has. As I mentioned at the CfD, subcategories are eligible for speedy renaming. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 06:06, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
    • If the move is not contested. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:13, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
      • Response And it wasn't--it was speedy-renamed per C2D. —Justin (koavf)TCM☯ 11:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Support. "Quran" is the style of the Associated Press and is therefore dominant in news reporting.[1] There isn't a single common name for the book anymore, but "Quran" is the NPOV middle ground between "Qur'an" and "Koran". Kauffner (talk) 10:34, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
  • Support all. Consistency is one of the key criteria of WP:AT. Jenks24 (talk) 22:54, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2005 Quran desecration controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:40, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2005 Quran desecration controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

YesY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2005 Quran desecration controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

No An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2005 Quran desecration controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2005 Quran desecration controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required on behalf of editors regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification, as with any edit, using the archive tools per instructions below. This message updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 1 May 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:01, 10 September 2017 (UTC)