Jump to content

Talk:2012 in spaceflight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former FLC2012 in spaceflight is a former featured list candidate. Please view the link under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. Once the objections have been addressed you may resubmit the article for featured list status.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 15, 2013Featured list candidateNot promoted

Orphaned references in 2012 in spaceflight

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 2012 in spaceflight's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Bluebook":

  • From 2010 in spaceflight: "Blue Book" (PDF). Sounding Rockets Program Office. NASA. Retrieved 14 June 2010.
  • From 2011 in spaceflight: "Blue Book" (PDF). NASA Sounding Rockets Program Office. Retrieved 28 December 2010.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Launches by Russian Federal Space Agency

[edit]

To User:Galactic Penguin SST: Hi, should not we use www.federalspace.ru as a primary source? I understand that there is a info in forums/news that probably FM-6 will be delayed, but let's use www.federalspace.ru as a primary source.Savemaxim (talk) 09:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No. If it is out of date, then it doesn't matter how official it might be, it is still out of date and therefore should be given no weight whatsoever. --W. D. Graham 10:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In this case, the delay was actually reported by Interfax: http://www.interfax.ru/politics/txt.asp?id=231515. And even if I can't find an "official" source, it would be difficult to make a reasonable launch schedule with only "official sources", simply because more than 90% of them are not notable to the general public, so usually I can only rely on forum posts or news articles to get a launch date for most of these launches. On the other hand, I would agree with Savemaxim to cite every PAST launch with a reliable source, as one could almost always find a suitable source for them. I'll do that later today for this article. Galactic Penguin SST (talk) 13:14, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suborbital flights

[edit]

I would like to kindly suggest that suborbital flights are moved to another list (probably in their own page) There seem to be a lot of them, and they seem to be updated less often, with a few of them lingering in the previous month with no set date or result. Additionally, they are not included in most of the other sections with the summaries. RubenGarciaHernandez (talk) 12:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion: instead, we could highlight the suborbital flights differently, say with a different background color. (In my opinion, the Karman line is a far more arbitrary cutoff than minimum orbital velocity.) --IanOsgood (talk) 17:36, 18 August 2012 (UTC) I like IanOsgood's suggestion. RubenGarciaHernandez (talk) 19:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected Iranian launch failure: to list or not to list?

[edit]

The latest issue of Jane's Intelligence Review has presented evidence that Iran has launched the Fajr satellite in late May as once scheduled, but failed to reach orbit. Since we don't even know on which day it was launched (unlike the more compelling case in August 2008), and the analysis still has a bit of uncertainty in it, should we put an entry here? Galactic Penguin SST (talk) 22:16, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • It is pretty certain there was a launch, and several other reliable sources are stating that it launched on 23 May (which was the originally scheduled launch date, and no short-term delay was announced), so I'd go with that. --W. D. Graham 18:15, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flags glitch?

[edit]

Why have all the Russian launches now got an Israeli flag next to them? Is that a wikimarkup glitch or vandalism? — Michaelmas1957 (talk) 10:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed for finding two articles on Jane's publications

[edit]

I am trying to find out how to properly cite two articles, one on the Jane's Intelligence Review and another on the Jane's Defense Weekly, about two possible Iranian launch failures in 2012:

  • Nick Hansen, Rocket science - Iran's rocket programme, Jane's Intelligence Review (1 October 2012), P.?
  • ?, Analysing Iran’s satellite launch failure (?), Jane's Defense Weekly (21 November 2012), P.5

Unfortunately I'm missing some of the details listed above to make a proper citation for these articles (they are the only sources AFAIK about them), and neither I nor my university have subscription to either of them. If anyone here have access to these two publications, please put the proper citation here and I'll put them on this article. Thanks!

Galactic Penguin SST (talk) 03:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The putative October 2012 Iranian launch failure may actually be a test flight of the Kavoshgar-5 suborbital rocket (http://www.b14643.de/Spacerockets_1/Rest_World/Safir-1B-IRILV/Description/Frame.htm; http://www.b14643.de/Spacerockets_1/Rest_World/Safir-1B-IRILV/Description/Frame.htm). 68.4.28.33 (talk) 02:16, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Vahe Demirjian[reply]

Satmex 8 Launch

[edit]

Given the Proton failure yesterday, this is almost certainly postponed. Should we take it off now, or wait for official confirmation? 82.42.214.246 (talk) 22:52, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.army-technology.com/news/newsisrael-tests-arrow-3-anti-ballistic-missile-system
    Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:36, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on 2012 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:26, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2012 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on 2012 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:26, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on 2012 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on 2012 in spaceflight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iran launch in September 2012

[edit]

There was a Safir launch in 22 September 2012 which does not exist in this list [1] [2] Barecode (talk) 14:57, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2012_in_spaceflight&oldid=1196627409"