Talk:2014 Stanley Cup Finals
 | Per the discussion in 2008 and an RFC in 2016, consensus is for all the Stanley Cup series articles to have "FinalS", with an "S" at the end, in the article title. Per the policy on article titles, Wikipedia uses the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources, NOT the NHL's official preference (see also Wikipedia's guidelines on formatting trademarks and essay on using official names). Thanks. |
 | A news item involving 2014 Stanley Cup Finals was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 15 June 2014. |  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Captainless[edit]
Trivia note, which could be added to the article. The New York Rangers are the first captainless team to reach the Finals, since the 1973 Chicago Blackhawks. GoodDay (talk) 10:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Article title[edit]
Why is this article called "Finals" (plural) when the logo, the NHL.com website, etc. all call it the "Final" (singular)? 192.65.41.20 (talk) 00:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC) Never mind, I just read the notice above. How stupid. 192.65.41.20 (talk) 00:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- It's okay to refer to it in either way, but it does not seem to be the time to re-open the discussion. Some people say Final, some say Finals. I originally thought Finals was best and have changed my mind, but it seems to be either too late to re-open the discussion or too early. The NHL clearly has named it the Final. I think to differentiate from the NBA. Going back in time, it's not even clear when it started to be called the Final or Finals. If you go through the hockey articles you will see both spellings. Alaney2k (talk) 03:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, although the NHL officially uses "Final" (singular) now, many reliable sources still use the plural. And what is worse is that some of these sources still inconsistently use "Final" and "Finals" interchangeably. Look at recent news articles: this Fox Sports article uses the singular in the headline, but the plural "Stanley Cup finalS" still appears in the second paragraph of the body of the article. In this CBS Sports.com article, they seem to start using "Final", but the phrase "Cup finals opener" with a "S" seems to suddenly appear in one of the last paragraphs. And this Bleacher Report article uses the S in the headline but not in the body. I blame the NHL for allowing the media to use the plural "Finals" term for several years, and then turn around and officially change it to the singular form, expecting every source to follow suit. Well that is hard when everybody is using "NBA Finals", and dictionaries are starting to follow by officially listing the full definition of the noun "final" as "usually used in plural".[1] Zzyzx11 (talk) 03:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2014 Stanley Cup Finals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714161822/http://www.nbcumv.com/node/865971 to http://www.nbcumv.com/node/865971
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:02, 10 May 2017 (UTC)