Jump to content

Talk:2022 Brink's theft

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

  • ALT1: ... that the jewelers victimized in the theft from a Brink's truck two years ago today admit they undervalued their wares but argue the company should still pay them full value because it was negligent? Source: "So two months later, Brink’s sued them in a New York federal court, in part accusing the jewelers of breach of contract and of fraud because they had allegedly undervalued their items. 'Brink’s believes that each Defendant seeks to recover more from Brink’s than is permitted under the Contract,' the company wrote in its suit ... Two weeks later, 14 of the 15 victims countersued Brink’s in Los Angeles County Superior Court, seeking $200 million in total damages. (Since then, three have settled for an undisclosed sum.) They accuse the company of negligence for putting their valuables in a lightly protected truck, especially after being warned of heightened security risk at the expo." Same source as above
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Barry Burton
  • Comment: As indicated I would really for this to run on July 11. I will be asking at WT:DYK for some expedited review.
Created by Daniel Case (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 279 past nominations.

Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC).[reply]