Talk:2024 Rose Bowl

bracket

will anyone create the bracket for the college football playoff this year? michigan, washington, texas, and alabama are in. KameronS333 (talk) 23:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

game summary

will anyone do the game summary for the rose bowl? KameronS333 (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that Michigan and Alabama entered the 2024 Rose Bowl as the two winningest programs in college football history?

• Source: https://mgoblue.com/documents/2023/12/24/20231224-fbl-notes-alabama.pdf

• ALT1: ... that Michigan and Alabama entered the 2024 Rose Bowl as the two college football teams with the most all-time wins? Source: same as ALT0
• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Page Ackerman
• Comment: 3,352 B → 16,094 B (4.8x expansion, a tiny bit short of 5x - any reviewers feeling generous and in the "close enough" spirit would be appreciated)

5x expanded by PCN02WPS (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 77 past nominations.

PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC).

• Comment: I was confused by the word winningest which upon googling seems to be a term only used in the U.S. or North America, so maybe the word could be removed. Sahaib (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
  • @Sahaib: added reworded ALT1. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 15:42, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

General eligibility:

• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Ready to go. Sahaib (talk) 15:51, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:2024 Rose Bowl/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 02:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 03:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Will review this! Comments will probably be finished in the next 72 hours! Arconning (talk) 03:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

@PCN02WPS Here are my comments, made some minor copy-edits. Hope they can be addressed! Arconning (talk) 17:38, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

@Arconning Everything has been taken care of or responded to! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:33, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

• Mentions of winningest should be replaced with something more formal.
  • Done, using the same language as the DYK hook. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Lead and infobox

• bowl games which concluded, replace which with that.
• The winner qualified through to the 2024 College Football Playoff, wondering if this should be ...for the 2024 College Football Playoff?
  • Done both. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Background

• No issues, nice work.

Teams

• regular season, wondering if this should be hyphenated?
  • No, "regular season" is a commonly used noun phrase in college football and is never hyphenated. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Game summary

• After two plays for no gain,, is this an American football term that should be wikilinked?
  • There really isn't a single applicable term for this, all I'm saying is that they did not gain or lose any yardage. I'll reword to make this clearer. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
• . Michigan took a knee to run the remaining seconds off of the clock and send the game to overtime., "took a knee", same with preceding comment
  • I linked quarterback kneel at the end of the paragraph about the second quarter but since it's worded differently here I linked it again. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
• Tables are formatted properly.

Aftermath

• Optional. I was wondering if the last could be merged somewhere?
  • Where would you suggest? PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
    • At a second check, this would be better like that lol.

Images

• All images are relevant to the article and have proper licensing.

Refs

• Earwig's okay.
• Random ref checks: 1, 14, 21, 24, 37, 43, good.
• I'd like to question the reliability of 29, Football Zebras. If it's reliable, it should probably use it's name rather than the website to follow consistency with the ref layout
  • I haven't had problems with the site in GANs past (see 2021 College Football Playoff National Championship, for example), so I believe it's good. Everything I've found on there has been backed up by other sources including official game statsheets, as well. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:32, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Misc

• No ongoing edit war, broad and focused info, neutral.

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.