Talk:332d Expeditionary Operations Group

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 332d Expeditionary Operations Group article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / World War II / Cold War / Post-Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)
	Post-Cold War task force

Merge

Page merged with 332d Air Expeditionary Wing. Ndunruh (talk) 15:27, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Tuskegee Airmen?

Should this be merged with Tuskegee Airmen? --Zegoma beach (talk) 13:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted factually inaccurate information

Deleted outdated information regarding this unit's record. Recent research has shown that bombers were confirmed shot down while under the 332d's protection. The claim that the Tuskegee airmen shot down the first Me 262's of the war has also been shown to be quite dubious.--24.179.209.239 (talk) 13:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If the Me 262 record is dubious, produce the record that proves it. Some have said that The airmen may have lost twenty five bombers during WWII entirely. White units were losing more than that per mission. So far no research has been produced to counteract their record. So produce yours. 01/19/2013 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.90.231.149 (talk) 01:12, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article entirely

The problem stemmed from an editor moving this article from 332nd Fighter Group to 332d Fighter Group and no other moves are now allowed unless an admin does it. The USAF and all other credible sources have 332nd as the correct title. The editor used a "cut-and-paste" method that further complicated matters. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:33, 30 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Pages now histmerged, WP:Parallel history part moved to 332d Fighter Group/version 2. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ...Which has been moved to 332 EOG. Steel1943 (talk) 14:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: article moved by User:Bzuk ~~ GB fan ~~ 08:14, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

332d Fighter Group → 332nd Fighter Group — Anthony Appleyard (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 332d Expeditionary Operations Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029192052/http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-130905-006.pdf to http://www.afhra.af.mil/shared/media/document/AFD-130905-006.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WWII losses

The WWII section should include both the pilot and aircraft losses, which are documented in the related article on the Tuskegee Airmen under "Controversy over escort record."Starhistory22 (talk) 03:41, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Attribution

Text and references copied from 332nd Fighter Group to Mac Ross, See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:59, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]