Talk:AAC

Moving Redlinks

These are Redlinks that may have articles in the future, please add them back and note if you see a bluelink. --Nekura 18:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Acoustic Concepts - Removed July 14, 2006

Acting Assistant Commissioner...

...a link to Assistant Commissioner does not do it without an explanation of the "acting" there or here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trexpro (talk • contribs) 22:13, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per WP:SNOW. JHunterJ (talk) 12:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

AAC (disambiguation) → AAC – So....

I ended up here from Wikipedia:Help_desk/Archives/2011_December_26#Help_with_disambig and I'm proceding fairly gently because I've not much experience of this part of wikipedia - so AAC redirected to Advanced_Audio_Coding, and I think it would be an improvement for AAC to redirect to the current disambig page AAC_(disambiguation) - I brought this up at Wikipedia_talk:Requested_moves#Looking_for_a_bit_of_direction... and after a quick conversation there boldly changed the redirect. Following some feedback from User:Theoldsparkle I've opened this move request to a) move AAC (disambiguation) to AAC per WP:DABNAME, and b) more generally to see if there is any community objection to the move... (for full disclosure I do a lot of work on Augmentative_and_alternative_communication, which is how I first became involved in this move). Failedwizard (talk) 17:14, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

support Yes, do it - in this case I think it's moving it back after AAC was made to redirect to Advanced Audio Codec, but as an obscure technical topic that's hardly primary. Given the many uses for AAC nothing is primary, so AAC should be a dab page, fairly uncontroversially I think.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 17:27, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support. This would be a better solution. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- the present AAC is just as obscure as most of the rest. There is clearly no single general primary topic, so that the correct course is for "AAC" to be a dabpage. Peterkingiron (talk) 23:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- I agree. A smart suggestion. --Poule (talk) 01:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.