Talk:ADA Amendments Act of 2008

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Disability

ADA Amendments Act of 2008 is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"Major life activities"

I've added the sentence "The law now specifies a list of major life activities, rather than leaving that phrase open to interpretation as the ADA of 1990 did." I know I've read that somewhere, which isn't a source, I know. I hope that I or someone else soon will find a reference for that. - Hordaland (talk) 12:21, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found and added a ref. The article needs development. If the restrictions that this new law is intended to remove are covered elsewhere on Wikipedia, they should be linked here. If not, summaries of court cases and other instances of narrowing the intent of the ADA might be added here. - Hordaland (talk) 17:32, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added Links, Detailed Some Changes and Broke into Several Sections

I added links to the Sutton and Toyota Supreme Court decisions I added links to the Senate bill that became law. I added detail to the changes in the definition of disability. I also changed the description of Supreme Court decision from "erroneous" to "controversial". While SCOTUS's decisions were likely not in line with Congressional intentions, they were not clearly erroneous. Is the article now sufficiently balanced to remove the neutrality question from December 2008? 67.82.89.250 (talk) 07:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements, thanks! The article had at one time, IIRC, a ref to a congressman's page about it, explaining how Congress' initial intentions had slowly been undermined by the courts and by the EEOC. Too bad that site disappeared.

In addition to the neutrality issue, the article is tagged for being in list form, made up entirely of bullet points. That's not critical - it can be changed - but the lack of a lead section is. Probably a lead paragraph or two should be added before the issue of neutrality is decided? - Hordaland (talk) 11:31, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ADA Amendments Act of 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]