Talk:Act 60 (Vermont law)

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

Education

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improvement

Thanks for improving this article. A couple of questions:

Does Act 68 etc. resolve the Killington question? Does that article (and other references strewed throughout Vermont articles need updating?
For purposes of this article is "citizen" the same as "taxpayer." i.e. An allowance was made for poor citizens of the state - some sort of rebate. Does this apply equally to taxpayers (who might not be citizens)? Student7 (talk) 16:24, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your encouragement and feedback, Student7. To answer your questions, here are my responses, to the best of my understanding:

I believe that Act 68 largely addresses the Killington issue, where there were funds flowing freely out of one district into another. Now, a district can spend up to 25% above a spending target without penalty. After that limit, a district must ship out $1 for every excess $1 budgeted. Still, just as within a town, there are always net giving properties that pay more in taxes than the services received and net receiving properties, so it is with towns across the state. Some give more than they receive from the state others receive more than they give. Act 68 just reduced the degree of wealth sharing.
As to citizen versus taxpayer, the state makes no citizenship test of a taxpayer. 32 VSA § 5401(7) provides the legal definition of a homestead, which includes it being the "principal dwelling owned and occupied by a resident individual...." Therefore the resident may not have the privilege to vote, but is paying taxes either as an owner or as a tenant (through their rent).

I hope that this helps. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 19:01, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resources for further revision

You can find a compilation of more citable sources of information on this topic at this link. User:HopsonRoad 21:42, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Act 60 (Vermont law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]