This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brahmoism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brahmoism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Hello. I notice that you have removed a lot of content from the article. I also note that, like you claim, the article reads strongly POV. I do hope you will restore content OR change the tone appropriately. Thank you! Prashanthns (talk) 15:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
But, if you feel most of the edits are ok, I suggest you restore sections of the article. Just waiting for the other user will not do. Thanks for understanding. Prashanthns (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
You cannot do this in Wikepedea. I have undone your deletes of mine edits. Shall be adding refernces. What partions you do have probleme with ?Lillycottage (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
While respecting the spirit of your edits, we think you are missing (widely off the mark) the religious aspects of the movement. It is disgraceful that Wikipedia allows controversial images to be uploaded to such religious pages by foreigners and aliens to our religion. Your motives for uploading such images is dubious : like your edit. Kindly rectify these and POV issues in this article. (Bikash Sen) 126.96.36.199 (talk) 04:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks Bikash. Unamimous. This article has got many POV biases. Lillycottage's version of Adi Dhrama (copied almost verbatim from Lillingworth (1907)) without attributing the source, actually carefully suppressing the source, <-- Note the coincidence in names too --> is outdated and skewed against Sadharan Brahmo Samaj, has Christian bias, ignores entirely Navabidhan missionary role in Pubjab and Central provinces. Has missed out the essential ceremonies of Indira Gandhi's marriage and the requirement of 2 priests. I could rant on and on, but shall start editing immediately instead. Yvantanguy (talk) 03:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)