Talk:Aikoku Kōtō

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Japan: History / Politics Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 20:46, October 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the History task force.

This article is supported by the Politics task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Accuracy of article

Hi. There appear to be a few problems with this article. 1. The Aikokusha is not the same as the Aikoku Koto, so Aikokusha shouldn't redirect here. 2. Itagaki Taisuke was never prime minister. 3. Itagaki was staunchly anti-socialist, which leads me to doubt that "there was also some socialist influence." 4. This article is really badly written.

Well, I'd like some other opinions on this. If I'm wrong about something, do correct me! --Zaxios 11:09, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are completely correct, which is why I have chosen to delete the existing article and replace it completely. --MChew 15:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]