Talk:Airport Link, Brisbane

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Airport Link, Brisbane is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Australian Roads: Queensland Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Australian Roads, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to roads and highways in Australian states and territories. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Australian RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject Australian RoadsTemplate:WikiProject Australian RoadsAustralia road transport articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics:
/
	Queensland

This article has been identified as having the following issues:
/
	This article has been flagged for a reassessment of its current rating.
	This article needs a map.
	This article needs a KML file. If it already has one, purge this page, or add \|needs-kml=no to the WikiProject Australian Roads banner.
	This article needs a road junction list. If it already has one, add \|needs-rjl=no to the WikiProject Australian Roads banner.

Untitled

I thought Bolton sold his proxies/voting interests to Theiss, not his units. Thats the version I have been hearing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.211.207.23 (talk) 06:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Construction section

I feel the construction section would read better if it was in chronological order and without sub-sections. Does any one disagree? - Shiftchange (talk) 06:52, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation style

Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:30, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request to expand this document

May someone please add a section about the workplace accident in which one of the workers was decapitated? There is a tangential reference to it and the establishment of a benefit here at 49 minutes https://vimeo.com/album/2975629/video/102167635. Additional reference http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/business/inspectors-dig-up-tunnel-safety-issues-20111006-1la7b.html— Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.23.40.151 (talk) 10:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Airport Link, Brisbane/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Removed section where the traffic modeling was incorrectly interpreted. It appears that a resentful investor is trying to discredit the project. The report referenced for this section was: http://www.aspo-australia.org.au/References/ASPO-Brisbane/QLD-TRANS-FACTS-2008-final-13NOV.pdf . Upon review of this report I could not find any evidence to support the claim that road traffic in Brisbane had been on the decline since 2004. I believe that the report has been misinterpreted... it does show a reduction in passenger kilometres, however there is a note stating that this is due to a decrease in the distance traveled by vehicles and a reduction in vehicle occupancy. This does not suggest a reduction in vehicles on the road during peak periods, but rather a reduction in non-essential trips (probably due to increased fuel costs). The report also shows a substantial increase in vehicle registration numbers.

It should be noted that the model used by Arup to forecast traffic volumes was based on a model used by Brisbane City Council. Both Council and the State Government authorities are anticipating an increase in vehicle trips over at least the next 25 years.

by a Transport Engineer (non-Arup employee)

Last edited at 14:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 06:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Airport Link, Brisbane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:12, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]