Jump to content

Talk:Alabama Highway Patrol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image copyright problem with File:AL -DPS State Trooper.jpg

[edit]

The image File:AL -DPS State Trooper.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:43, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Alabama Highway Patrol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP repeatedly removing list of fallen officers

[edit]

There is an IP editor that has repeatedly removed the list of fallen officers, erroneously invoking WP:MEMORIAL. WP:MEMORIAL says that "Subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements. Wikipedia is not the place to memorialize deceased friends, relatives, acquaintances, or others who do not meet such requirements." This editor repeatedly removed the list of deceased officers using multiple IPs using this false rationale. The subject of the article is Alabama Highway Patrol which clearly meets Wikipedia's notability requirements. Please stop removing this list under this mistaken interpretation of the policy. If you don't think that the list belongs here for other reasons, please discuss it here and gain consensus before removing it yet again. Toddst1 (talk) 22:14, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about "Subjects of encyclopedia articles must satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements. Wikipedia is not the place to memorialize deceased friends, relatives, acquaintances, or others who do not meet such requirements" don't you understand???? The list of fallen officers is nothing but a memorial to friends, relatives, acquaintances, or others who do not meet notability requirements.
This matter has already been discussed at WikiProject Law Enforcement, where the consensus was that a list of the deaths of non-notable officers is a memorial that should not be included in a police department article. After all, we don't have lists of fallen teachers in school articles, lists of fallen medical personnel in hospital articles, or lists of fallen inmates in prison articles. 32.218.152.189 (talk) 07:33, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As was explained above but apparenty not read, the subject of this article is the AHP, not the fallen officers. The individual officers do not have to pass WP:BIO as they are not the subject of the article. Beyond that, listing their deaths in the line of duty is hardly a memorial.
This discussion clearly states that there was a discussion and nothing was resolved. If such discussion took place and consensus reached, please provide a link. Toddst1 (talk) 17:58, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not the place to memorialize deceased friends, relatives, acquaintances, or others who do not meet such [notability] requirements. If you insist on not seeing the forest for the trees, then consider that the subject of the section is the memorial to deceased officers. Or you could just continue to close your mind and try not to understand. For some people, that's the best way to handle things. Cheers! 32.218.35.76 (talk) 14:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No consensus to point to at WikiProject Law Enforcement. Got it. Toddst1 (talk) 14:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
All this requires is an elementary understanding of basic English: Wikipedia is not the place to memorialize deceased friends, relatives, acquaintances, or others who do not meet such [notability] requirements. Which word(s) don't you understand? 32.218.47.203 (talk) 00:52, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To help you out of your WP:REHASH cycle, let me try it this way: Merely having a list does not constitute a memorial. Does List of Canadian correctional workers who have died in the line of duty constitute a memorial? No. It doesn't. It's merely a list.
The two points of WP:MEMORIAL are that the subject of a biographical article should be notable and that Wikipedia is not the place to publish an obituary of an otherwise non-notable person. Toddst1 (talk) 19:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Alabama Highway Patrol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:14, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Troops/jurisdiction

[edit]

@SGT141 added an image with an organizational layout for this highway patrol years ago, and some time later an IP editor added the table to the page which appears (though I have not verified each county) to mirror in text what the map shows in an image. However, no source for these statements appears to be provided, and a quick review of the homepage for the highway patrol doesn't appear to show any evidence of this organizational structure. Does anyone have a link/source to the AHP using this structure/organization? —Locke Cole • t • c 18:42, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Alabama_Highway_Patrol&oldid=1258624515"