Jump to content

Talk:Albannach (band)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

This article is nearly a word-for-word copy of the official band website http://www.albannachmusic.com/about.htm

Is this a copyright violation? 98.16.32.152 (talk) 01:04, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it has been a year (the above IP comment was me). I've tried to clean it up but we could use more citations/sources and a History -or- Background section. All of the articles for the albums and the Video are now created but need images & expansion (please feel free to contribute!). Time to sign off for the evening - Nunc est bibendum!
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 00:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple issues

[edit]

I am bemused at the removal of the tags I placed earlier on this article, described as "backdated". The edits I had made beforehand addressed some of the worst aspects of over-elaborated and off-topic non-pertinent minutiae, promotional and non-encyclopedic tone etc. but they hardly resolved the multiple issues which affect it, for which I tagged the article and which are still highly pertinent.

The article has but two references. One is used purely to support a quote from a band member, so without any supporting material from that source (and the link unfortunately is dead) it is thus stretching it to class a quote from the subject of the article as a secondary source. The other ref simply mentions them playing a gig abroad, which at best only weakly supports the text regarding frequent performances. Neither ref comes close to establishing notability. That's it for refs. How on earth are "refimprove" and "notability" tags not highly pertinent to this article? There is very much insufficient indication that they have received significant coverage in reliable sources.

Having whittled out the most irrelevant of the material, the section on indidvidual members particularly could still do with some work to cut it back. This section still forms the bulk of the article, does nothing to establish notability and this level of elaboration on individual members who are not notable in their own right, in a band whose notability has not been adequately established, seems excessive, particularly in relation to the dearth of other material in the article.

There's so little to go on here I'm pondering nominating for deletion. Mutt Lunker (talk) 12:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Albannach (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Interviews section removed from article

[edit]

In case there's something here that can be used as a ref: --Ronz (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]