Talk:Albatros D.V

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War I task force

Smithsonian Institution Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

I do not know who the IP users are who edited this page. I hope they let me know, though. The article is better, thanks to their input. Cheers, Guapovia 09:19, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The previous version (prior to 28 Dec 2007) of this article referred to an enlarged ventral fin. I have examined pictures of the plane and can see no evidence of a ventral (i.e. under the fuselage) fin, so I have changed the text to read "dorsal fin". If somebody has better information, feel free to revert the edit. Thanks. Raymondwinn (talk) 21:16, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Quite happy to discuss reasons for my recent ce choices, have added more detail to edit tags as compensation for reverting a revert. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 08:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ ‎M Van Houten, short sentences are pointless when the subject is the same, citations in the middle of sentences get in the way so if they aren't contentious I put them in order after the full stop and The D.Va was also fitted with a small diagonal brace connecting the lower section of the forward interplane strut to the leading edge of the lower wing, which was [also] retrofitted to some D.V aircraft. how about this then? Regards Keith-264 (talk)

Well, moving the citations out of the middle of the sentence I can live with. But I think splicing sentences is problematic because the combined sentence often loses something in clarity. In this specific case, it sounds like the D.Va lower wing was retrofitted to some D.V aircraft. Best regards, M Van Houten (talk) 02:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that to an extent it's a matter of preference but I find short, staccato sentences just as difficult. I've altered the brace again but if you don't like it, I'll accept your version. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 07:51, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Works for me! Best regards, M Van Houten (talk) 16:39, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

" Front line pilots were considerably dismayed and many preferred the older D.III; Manfred von Richthofen was particularly critical of the new aircraft." That's a semicolon that works! Well executed. Best regards, M Van Houten (talk) 17:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being so open-minded, it's been a pleasure.Keith-264 (talk) 18:37, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pleasure's mine! Best regards, M Van Houten (talk) 20:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carelessly translated the text into BritEng when I meant to click AutoEd, apologies.Keith-264 (talk) 13:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cost parameters

@BilCat: ? Keith-264 (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I can see why. The lang de is to stop bots reading German as a typo. Keith-264 (talk) 15:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, ok. There're better ways to do that, such as with {{Proper name}}, a redirect of {{Not a typo}}. BilCat (talk) 19:22, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]