This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 19:24, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
I found out that this article, which I wrote, is being considered for deletion. This comes as a surprise. I believe it is well-referenced, and I cannot see any clear-cut violation of any wikipedia policy I have read. However, I am a new user, and I don't really know how wikipedia operates too well yet. Anyway, if I make any mistakes, I know I can learn from them. I thank you for any constructive input/suggestions - both past and future. Sincerely, Rayjameson (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. "Minutes of conversations between plaintiffs". I'll have to remember that one next time I want to write a wikipedia article. "Of course there are no sources! It's all in my head! Don't you get it?" 222.149.75.88 (talk) 01:42, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The vast majority of the references for the article seem to be good and reliable now. If someone were to re-write the article from scratch, with only the linked references, I'm not sure it would be much different from what it is at this point. The tags on the article regarding references and close connection/point of view don't seem relevant at present.Minusminority (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]