Talk:Anas Rashid

File:2anasats.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:2anasats.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:2anasats.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:22, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Anas-rashid-eid-mubarak.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Anas-rashid-eid-mubarak.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Anas-rashid-eid-mubarak.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:23, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anas Rashid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120703224321/http://www.apunkachoice.com:80/content/slide_show/sid100009222-pics_aamir_khan_visits_sandhya_and_suraj_on_the_show_diya_aur_baati_hum/ to http://www.apunkachoice.com/content/slide_show/sid100009222-pics_aamir_khan_visits_sandhya_and_suraj_on_the_show_diya_aur_baati_hum/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Source from Unverified Facebook account

@Cyphoidbomb: Sir, can this video from an unverified facebook account be used as a valid source? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

@Fylindfotberserk: I wouldn't link to it, since we don't know where it came from. It's not licensed as Creative Commons. I know that's probably frustrating. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

OK I'll remove it. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Year of Birth confusions and Cousin source

@Cyphoidbomb: Sir,

I've used this source for his birth_date which seems most reliable but this source mentions him to be a year older ie 1980 birth which I changed to 1981 as per the former TOI source.

Secondly, the name of his cousins were not sourced in the older versions. I've added a TellyChakkar source. I've put a "better source" tag since TellyChakkar is not reliable as per WP:ICTF. Is it OK or the mention of his cousins need to be deleted? - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:35, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Some of these sources can be tricky to make sense of. This source you linked above doesn't have a publication date, it just says "Last updated on - Aug 31, 2015". That's not always helpful. What if this article was last updated a year after it was written? Anyway, you might consider adding it as a range like I did at Disha Patani. As for the cousin thing--I dunno, it seems fairly innocuous, I probably wouldn't object. There might be a valid argument for allowing some content from these lesser sites, due to a lack of quality references sometimes. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb:, Oh gosh, I missed the fact that this source doesn't have a publication date. Atleast the date and month would stay the same if not the year. I'll add a range like you suggested i.e. (1980-08-31)31 August 1980 or (1981-08-31)31 August 1981.

I typically do not remove TellyChakkar sources I come across unless I find a more reliable one. I tag it with a "better source needed". It is also because users in this discussion about TellyCkkar in WP:ICTF do not seem completely against it. But since, I've added this source myself, I thought it would be better to take advice from you. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:14, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

@Fylindfotberserk: For minor, uncontroversial pieces of information like release dates, or if the site has an interview, I personally look the other way--I'm not saying that other hardcore editors would agree with that, but there are a lot of gaps in Indian journalism, and we can't assume that Times of India is going to cover everything. But if the matter is gossipy or has the potential of being the subject of a big dispute, I'd remove lesser sources like this. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Totally agree with you sir. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:55, 5 March 2019 (UTC)