Jump to content

Talk:Anasuya Bharadwaj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article temporarily protected.

[edit]

Because IP edits have continually made bad edits to the page (for example, making unnecessary individual links to every word in a phrase), this page is locked until such conduct stops. IPs may suggest edits to the page here. bd2412 T 19:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Can you identify three sources that show that this subject is notable? To pass WP:NBIO these references need to show significant coverage, from a reliable source and must also be independent of the subject. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some sources in English language: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], and [10], and [11]. If you ask Telugu users, they could find sources in Telugu language.TamilMirchi (talk) 01:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's more than three - could you kindly pick the three best ones. Thee good sources are enough. --Salimfadhley (talk) 01:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed the first three articles you listed. They all seem to be recycled press-releases with a publicity photo. These are not significant coverage and they are not independent of the subject. --Salimfadhley (talk) 01:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do these count? [12], [13], [14], [15], and [16].TamilMirchi (talk) 01:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The first is a single paragraph, so not "significant coverage", 2nd one is better since it's a long-form tabloid article about an actors history. Third article is not independent because it is an interview article, simply reporting what the subject said about a matter. My point here is that most of these links seem to be tabloid junk and not the sort of thing we can infer notability from. --Salimfadhley (talk) 09:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]