Talk:Anasuya Bharadwaj
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 October 2020. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Article temporarily protected.
[edit]Because IP edits have continually made bad edits to the page (for example, making unnecessary individual links to every word in a phrase), this page is locked until such conduct stops. IPs may suggest edits to the page here. bd2412 T 19:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Sources
[edit]Can you identify three sources that show that this subject is notable? To pass WP:NBIO these references need to show significant coverage, from a reliable source and must also be independent of the subject. --Salimfadhley (talk) 00:59, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Here are some sources in English language: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], and [10], and [11]. If you ask Telugu users, they could find sources in Telugu language.TamilMirchi (talk) 01:23, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- That's more than three - could you kindly pick the three best ones. Thee good sources are enough. --Salimfadhley (talk) 01:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- I reviewed the first three articles you listed. They all seem to be recycled press-releases with a publicity photo. These are not significant coverage and they are not independent of the subject. --Salimfadhley (talk) 01:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Do these count? [12], [13], [14], [15], and [16].TamilMirchi (talk) 01:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- The first is a single paragraph, so not "significant coverage", 2nd one is better since it's a long-form tabloid article about an actors history. Third article is not independent because it is an interview article, simply reporting what the subject said about a matter. My point here is that most of these links seem to be tabloid junk and not the sort of thing we can infer notability from. --Salimfadhley (talk) 09:27, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Do these count? [12], [13], [14], [15], and [16].TamilMirchi (talk) 01:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class India articles
- Low-importance India articles
- Stub-Class India articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject India articles