Talk:Ancestry.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Computing / Software / Websites (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Software (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Websites (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Apple Inc. (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Macintosh, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Genealogy (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject Companies (Rated B-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This article has been rated as B-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Versions[edit]

Most pages about computer software include a history of the various versions the program has gone through. I think this would be very helpful to understand the version you work with and it's features and lack thereof. This program in particular has been problematic for many genealogists - amateur and professional - and supposedly the latest version has been a real step in the wrong direction! Time to track it!--Don (talk) 01:08, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

I gather you mean a version /release history like some of the programs have. The following links will be useful to build one [1], [2], [3],[4], [5], [6], (Changes in Family Tree Maker by version only cover FTM4 to FTM16), Re: (FTM-TECH) Would like list of FTM Versions, Official FTM Blog category, Technical Support for Family Tree Maker Versions 10 and Earlier, FTM software merry-go-round version history ftm 1 to 5, company history - Paul B
Is this finished? Narracan3824 (talk) 01:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
This is wikipedia Narracan3824, which means you don't need permission to work on something. gioto (talk) 23:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Email List

(move table to main article)

  • Done Gioto (talk) 07:01, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

[edit]

Membership to this service is certainly not cheap. Could somebody with a subscription give me a hand, please? I'm working on a bio for a Christchurch mayor, and a whole lot of the Bishop family emigrated to New Zealand in one go; at least the passenger list shows the surname quite a few times. I'd probably make some inroads if I know who the mayor's siblings are and I wonder whether Charles Wellington Bishop is one of them. Please contact me via my talk page or by Wikimail. Schwede66 21:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

I've got another bio where I'm a bit perplexed. Lots of sources say that Gerard George Fitzgerald (1834–1904) was a brother of James FitzGerald (1818–1896; and there's no doubt that they are talking about this person, as they usually qualify this by referring to the former "auditor general"). What puzzles me is that it says in James FitzGerald's official biography that he "was the youngest son of Gerald FitzGerald"; he was some 16 years older than Gerard George! The other thing that makes research hard is that GG Fitzgerald was a very private person. Things like marriages or death were certainly not advertised in newspapers. His 1940 bio talks about his wife drowning in a shipping disaster, but that appears to have been his second marriage. I haven't found any other trace about his first wife (Jane Michie) than a link to the marriage certificate (assuming that the Gerard George Fitzgerald talked about is indeed him). Given that Fitzgerald was dealing with banks in Melbourne in the 1850s, I wouldn't be surprised if had a connection to Sir Archibald Michie. Any help much appreciated; please contact me via my talk page or by Wikimail. Schwede66 03:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

No criticism or controversy?[edit]

Why is there no Criticism or Controversy section in this article? There are many, many consumer and ethics/privacy complaints about the Ancestry conglomerate on ratings sites like My Web Of Trust (mywot.com); something is just not right about the discrepancy between this article and all the criticism and dissatisfaction that is reported elsewhere. To me the article reads like a carefully-crafted advertisement. It probably should be flagged as such and monitored.--IfYouDoIfYouDon't (talk) 08:13, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

There was a "Controversy" section in this article some time ago, but it was removed in 2009 on the basis that there was very little concrete information there that might not apply equally well to almost any large company. If you have reliable sources for controversy that is specific to Ancestry.com, I encourage you to be bold and add it :-) —Tim Pierce (talk) 17:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Came to ask the same thing, I'll just leave this: Video: Who Do They Think They Are? – A Lighthearted Look at Today’s Genealogy Searches, Dick Eastman · April 28, 2015 . The video is by The Checkout — Preceding unsigned comment added by So-retro-it-hurts (talkcontribs) 03:02, 30 April 2015 (UTC)