Talk:Antidoto

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article protected

This article is one in a series that has been subjected to disruptive editing for several months. Accordingly, it has been semi-protected for a like term. Logged in contributors who have been autoconfirmed are still able to edit the article. If you are not registered or autoconfirmed, you can still request that an edit be made to this article at this talk page. If the talk page is not active, you can place {{editsemiprotected}} (brackets and all) next to your suggestion, and another editor will soon review your request. See Wikipedia:Protection policy for more information. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 17:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sales

As I know Antidoto is a 2× platinum album, selling 100,000 copies. But even this is not official. The official sales of Antidoto is 80,000 as there isn't any award for the album's sales. Finally the official site of Anna Vissi, fannatics, refer that the album is 2× platinum. But in any case the album isn't 3× platinum Teo628957 comment added by Teo628957 (talk • contribs) 11:10, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In 1998, the sales level to become 2x platinum was to sell 50,000 copies[1], so 100,000 would be correct. 80,000 would only mean 1x platinum. I'm not sure where 3x came from and I will do some research. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Her official website says she sold 80,000 in one week, not overall. With that being said it is very likely that she sold well over 100,000 copies in the following months. The certification figure that was sourced (the link is now dead) said 180,000 copies total, which would lead to a 3x certification. Also keep in mind that some media self-awards certifications based on sales. A certification is not automatic so some just say oh it sold x amount so its platinum when it can only be platinum after the record label sends an application to IFPI, has its sales audited, and pays a fee. Years later when albums are still selling at a much lower rate, sales increase, but certification do not always even if a new threshold is passed. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I managed to found the article from another link. It says that Antidoto saled 130,000 copies (2x platinum), Klima Tropiko saled 105,000 copies (Platinum) and Travma saled 170,000 copies (3x platinum). http://img.pathfinder.gr/clubs/files/22126/5.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.73.107.121 (talk) 20:08, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fan clubs are not considered reliable. The best source would be a link to a website owned by IFPI and not a wesbsite which claims that their information comes from IFPI. Like I said, IFPI does not like to give the information out so anytime someone says IFPI says I wonder if IFPI actually told them or did they compile their own list using old, outdated, previously filed IFPI data. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the article for the music magazine Difono. You can see the name of the magazine down right. Also, you use this article as a source in this page. You must come up against the trust. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.131.138.47 (talk) 10:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No the link you posted is for pathfinder clubs. You will have to track down a link actually published by Difono, not a website that claims to have used its information. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Antidoto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]