Talk:Antonio de Vea expedition

Chile Low‑importance

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spain Low‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / European / South America / Spanish / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	South American military history task force
	Spanish military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

A fact from Antonio de Vea expedition appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 January 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 17th-century Antonio de Vea expedition to the fjords and channels of Patagonia was triggered by false rumours about English settlements?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Antonio de Vea expedition.

Wikipedia

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 21, 2021.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

A dalca, a type of boat used in the expedition.

... that the Antonio de Vea expedition (1675–1676) to the fjords and channels of Patagonia was triggered by false rumours about English settlements? Source: "y que todo esto lo había dicho porque le parecía que gustaban los españoles de esto, y que nunca creyó que llegásemos tan adelante” (Vea 1675:606). Desengañados los españoles, ese fue el fin de la búsqueda."
- ALT1:... that disinformation spread by Cristóbal Talcapillán triggered the Antonio de Vea expedition (1675–1676) to the fjords and channels of Patagonia?
- ALT2:... that the Antonio de Vea expedition (1675–1676) to the fjords and channels of Patagonia greatly improved Spanish knowledge of western Patagonia?

Created by Sietecolores (talk). Self-nominated at 20:20, 4 January 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Article is very interesting, comprehensive, new enough, long enough, well written and referenced. I did some minor copyedits. Of the hooks, I prefer ALT0 as more concise and interesting. The image is suitable, used in the article, and properly licensed. Nominator has only two DYKs, so QPQ is not required. Good to go.Constantine ✍ 18:32, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When...

The article didn't state when the expedition took place, until the aftermath section. I put "seventeenth century" in the lead paragraph. A more exact date would be better. Geo Swan (talk) 23:48, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geo Swan, thank you for noticing this. The date has been added to the lead now. Sietecolores (talk) 04:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]