Talk:Anwick

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Anwick article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lincolnshire Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Can we agree on this as the definitive format? coor_dms and gbmapping links are a bit redundant but if you like them, I don't mind.

Please note:

region:GB_scale:100000 added to the coor_dms call
templates
Aerial not arial !

Incidentally, I find http://www.streetmap.co.uk better to find places. When you have got the arrow pointing where you want, look at the bottom for "Click here to convert/measure coordinates". That will give you the eastings and northing ready to cut and paste into the mmuknr_map and mmuknr_photo calls. -- RHaworth 22:33, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well the problem is every now and then, someone comes along on this long term project and decides they have a better idea, and starts a revert war. Thats why, after cleaning up the intial entires, ive not managed to get past 'B' in filling in, every time i do, i end up going back through the ones Ive done to satisfy someones whim. At some point, we have to say enough is enough, and unless we now leave it as is, we will never get the rest done. Your just another one of these passer's by who think they know better. Ive been here before and got the T shirt. Once Ive messed around and wasted time doing these changes, some other smartass will be along in another 6 months with another bright idea. Hence you can see im not to keen on making yet another change to the layout, on the whim of someone who isnt prepared to spend the time needed to make all this change to all the existing articles. As I said, the one you did do were a random selection, which was even worse. -- user:lincspoacher

And as I said is there another way I could have found them, reliably, in alphabetical order? I hesitate to get personal, but I feel you may be taking an overly possessive attitude to the articles. -- RHaworth 04:18, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WOW, pit-yacker, your ability to take an article that was easy on the eye to read and turn it into a dense mass of linked unreadable text is pretty awesome. Do you REALLY HONESTLY think that compressing the page into the minimum space is a good plan ?

Lincolnshire Poacher 22:50, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319090755/http://www.raf-lincolnshire.info/anwick/anwick.htm to http://www.raf-lincolnshire.info/anwick/anwick.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]