This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
A Digital marketing agency just like thousands in the world. Awards are non-notable as the company itself. Only here to build SEO/ Online Reputation and nothing else. Light2021 (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree. An app for the British Museum is significant and credible, as is the app for The Guardian newspaper. I'm not in the UK, but the awards and newspapers that it are reported in seem significant and credible. To quote WP:A7 "If the claim of significance is credible, the A7 tag can not be applied, even if the claim does not meet the notability guidelines.". It cannot be said that there is "No indication of importance" in the article.
Perhaps it wouldn't survive AfD, but it's not A7.
I've removed the advert tag, as the sentences don't seem particularly advertisement like to me. I don't see much self-promotion there (as opposed to plain fact giving, e.g. "based in", "they develop" and "founded by"). peterl (talk) 06:38, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
