Jump to content

Talk:Arbalist (crossbowman)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge with Crossbow?

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
No merge. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Against: Seems to me the weapon and the shooter should have their own encyclopedic entries (would be like combing horse and rider, or car and driver, or racket and tennis player. Furthermore, the current crossbow article focuses on historical use. Combining the articles would perpetuate the confusion between arbalest and arbalist.76.110.165.21 (talk) 21:29, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Against, expand it on how to become an arbalist and write more on their role as mercenaries and in maritime warfare. Wandalstouring (talk) 08:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Arbalist (crossbowman). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]