Jump to content

Talk:Architecture of Rajasthan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:INDIA Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition

[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 09:07, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why is temple architecture is placed under History section?

[edit]

Why is temple architecture is placed under History section? While every other architecture like forts and palaces are under separate para Sajaypal007 (talk) 21:35, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Johnbod can it be improved? Or is it alright. Sajaypal007 (talk) 21:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also cenotaph is under fort and palace category. Sajaypal007 (talk) 21:37, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The most famous and most-visited historic architecture of Rajasthan, by far, is the later Rajput forts, palaces, and to a lesser extent the cenotaphs. I imagine this is what most readers are most interested in. So in this case I thought it better to have these together in a section at the top, and then have the usual chronological run-through of other periods. What the article most needs now, I think, is a section on havelis. Johnbod (talk) 12:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was not to merge. Vexations (talk) 11:17, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both articles have the same topic and the same main source, Michell Vexations (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.