Talk:As Good as It Gets
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the As Good as It Gets article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Page move
[edit]This page was moved from from "As Good As It Gets" to "As Good as It Gets". Currently policy states that "the standard rule in the English language is to capitalize words that are the first word in the title and those that are not conjunctions (and, but, or, nor, for), prepositions (to, over, through) or articles (an, a, the, that)." The word "as" is a preposition and as such has been changed to lowercase.
I should point out though that this was taken from the naming of albums and songs but this is being applied across the board ie. to television shows, films, books, computer and video games, plays etc. -- Ianblair23 (talk) 03:26, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
I realize this happened a while ago, but I thought that when articles are titled about movies and books that they retain the capitalization of the original work. That same issue arose with "I am a Fugitive From a Chain Gang," concerning the capitalization of "am" I think.--Stetsonharry (talk) 14:46, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- No, they are capitalized according to WP:NCCAPS. And the same issue did not arise with "I Am a Fugitive from a Chain Gang". An anon did argue that "am" should be lowercased, but not on the basis of the capitalization of the original work (the official movie poster for that movie uses ALL CAPS), and the anon was wrong anyway, since "am" is a verb, not an article, preposition, or coordinating conjunction. —Lowellian (reply) 08:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Plot Cleanup
[edit]I removed a few run on sentences in the plot section and cleaned up some of the wording, nothing major. Wtbe7560 17:18 26 November 2006
- I've trimmed the plot drastically, basing my rewrite on an earlier version of the article. [1] --Tony Sidaway 21:30, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
There's nothing wrong with this article's plot summary, in fact it's excellent. Those labels at the top of the page give this page a bad name. I'm not saying this because I wrote the article...Srikipedia (talk) 05:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- The plot summary is good, but actually I agree that it is too long. I also agree with one of the previous comments that the notices at the top are a bit too much, even though they are correct.--Stetsonharry (talk) 14:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I cut the plot summary but it really needs more cutting.--Stetsonharry (talk) 14:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, this was my first time editing a Wikipedia page and I'm afraid I made some mistakes by rewriting a lot of the plot and cluttering the editing history a lot. I embellished the general overview, rewrote most of the plot section and specified cities where the movie took place which had not been mentioned before. I also corrected some misinformation that was in the article about the length of the road trip the three characters take in the movie. Anyway, I will pay closer attention to etiquette in future edits. Unaova (talk) 06:55, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Plot
[edit]I do not recall a scene in which Simon is killed by his former attackers nor such being implied. I could be wrong, however, as it has been a few years since I have watched the film. Please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.22.198 (talk) 06:33, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Additional Sources
[edit]I've added a Rotten Tomatoes listing and New York Times review to verify. Please advise if additional sources are deemed necessary. I believe this should be more than sufficient. BigBrightStars (talk) 01:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Racist homophobic misanthrope
[edit]Is it really necessary to add the two adjectives in front of misanthrope? A misanthrope hates people, period, regardless of race, gender, sexual preference, religion, etc. Melvin makes anti-Semitic comments in the cafe, so should we add anti-Semite as well? He is a misanthrope, period. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 23:50, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
"Melvin Udall is a blind misanthrope..." There is no indication that the character of Melvin Udall is blind, and much that he is not: he watches television, reads and drives a car. ~cneron — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.172.170.142 (talk) 00:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)