This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of April 12, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
1. Well written?: Pass
2. Factually accurate?: Pass
3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
5. Article stability? Pass
6. Images?: Pass
Thank you to everyone who worked on addressing my above comments and improving this article. Thanks as well to the folks at WP:MMM, for getting us all motivated on this topic and making it happen. I suggest that the next step would be to take this article through the Peer Review process after some more copy-editing, and notify the talkpages of relevant WikiProjects, WP:MMM, WP:SOUTHAM, WP:BIOGRAPHY, and WP:LIT, when the peer review is started.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Cirt (talk) 10:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Cirt, many thanks for this, and for your own work and input in reviewing and giving advice! --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 10:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
You are most welcome. This article is well on its way down the path towards WP:FA, but I'd really solicit input from all those various WikiProjects at the peer review. Cirt (talk) 11:06, 12 April 2008 (UTC)