Talk:Bang Rak subdistrict
Appearance
A fact from Bang Rak subdistrict appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Sources
[edit]English - History & places
- https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jla_ubu/article/view/94528
- https://www.bangkokpost.com/life/social-and-lifestyle/1678672/bring-yourself-to-bang-rak
- https://www.bangkokriver.com/plan_visit/creative-district/
- https://thesiamsociety.org/activity/a-visit-to-bangrak/
- https://www.bangkok101.com/bang-rak-meets-bukruk/
Revitalisation, Creative District
- https://southeastasiaglobe.com/charoenkrung-road-bangkok/
- http://www.mackerel.life/walking-through-a-citys-layers-bangkoks-creative-district
- https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/NAJUA-Arch/article/view/228494
- http://ithesis-ir.su.ac.th/dspace/bitstream/123456789/2148/1/57056964.pdf
- https://bk.asia-city.com/city-living/news/how-charoenkrung-road-reinventing-itself-bangkoks-hippest-street
- https://www.thebigchilli.com/feature-stories/bangkoks-latest-it-spot-feels-like-a-slice-of-brooklyn-the-creative-district
Gentrification
- https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/109809
- https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1515430/old-boyz-n-the-charoen-krung-hood
- https://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/bangkok/2017/11/08/residents-overlooked-bangkoks-flourishing-neighborhoods/
Thai
- https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jasac/article/view/227253
- https://www.silpa-mag.com/history/article_23880
- https://www.facebook.com/Vlekprapaifoundation/posts/3328191660586634
- https://www.facebook.com/Vlekprapaifoundation/posts/3620054948066969
- https://www.bangkokriver.com/th/place/history-of-bang-rak/
- https://readthecloud.co/walk-west-side-story/
- https://readthecloud.co/walk-nightlife/
- https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/news/detail/757732
- https://adaymagazine.com/soi-13/
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:28, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Bangkok's Bang Rak neighbourhood is home to Buddhist temples, mosques, a Chinese shrine, and the city's Catholic cathedral (pictured)? Source: "Bang Rak has been home to multicultural groups of people. They are those who have different beliefs, ranging from Buddhism to Taoism, Christianity and Islam..."[1] (each also mentioned separately in sources)
- ALT1:... that the enterprising businessman Nai Lert's seven-storey emporium in Bang Rak (pictured) used to be the tallest building in Bangkok? Source: "Later, in 1927, the road saw the construction of the capital’s first high-rise building – a seven-storey building built by Nai Lert..."[2], and other Thai sources listed in the article
- Reviewed: Beyond LIVE
Created by Paul_012 (talk). Self-nominated at 22:23, 13 January 2021 (UTC).
- Article was (barely) new enough and long enough at the time of the nomination, and sourcing appears to be adequate. Although both hooks are cited inline, the first one appears to be the best option here. However, the Bangkok Post link used as a source is giving a 404 error, and while I'm willing to AGF on the content for DYK purposes, it could cause problems down the road if it isn't resolved. A QPQ has been done. The nomination will be approved once the issue with the 404 link is resolved. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm. Not sure what they're up to with the URLs. It's still available at this link.[3] --Paul_012 (talk) 08:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, the new link works and the information is verified. As for the image, I'll leave it to the promoter if it's to be used, but personally I think the details look too small in the current size. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Article was (barely) new enough and long enough at the time of the nomination, and sourcing appears to be adequate. Although both hooks are cited inline, the first one appears to be the best option here. However, the Bangkok Post link used as a source is giving a 404 error, and while I'm willing to AGF on the content for DYK purposes, it could cause problems down the road if it isn't resolved. A QPQ has been done. The nomination will be approved once the issue with the 404 link is resolved. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)