Talk:BattleTech Centers

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

BattleTech Centers:

This list was updated based on an edit by VirtualWorld Owner Nick Smith that got reverted. He is the direct source on this information, so no reference is needed, however, I referenced the list of sites on the website, as well as his post on the forums stating he made the original edit as sources for the official information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dicion (talk • contribs) 00:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits on BattleTech Centers:

I'm not sure why so many edits keep getting reverted. I updated content to keep it factual and had edits purged indicating that the referred site did not match (The company website that I own and operate). When I reverted indicating that the data was indeed on the web site, another editor removed the operators listing outright stating that wikipedia isnt the yellow pages.

Well, from what I can tell, plenty of other articles feature product and location information (Planet Hollywood for example). How does this relevant information breach the intent if Wikipedia? -PropWash PropWash (talk) 19:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was reverting changes to the list of BattleTech Centers because I kept going to http://www.mechjock.com/main/sites/ and finding information that differed from the website. The Mechjock.com website takes precedence over Wikipedia. (I think I've been through this before.) It looks like the Mechjock site has, finally, been updated so I won't be reverting changes to the BattleTech center list. --TreyGeek (talk) 04:18, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We support a history and list of the historical Battletech sites. We desire to avoid self-proclaimed authorities. As someone with interest in the regulatory aspect, the sources should have been better cited. Propwash that is self proclaimed as the "owner" should be vetted with regulatory authorities. Example: go to the State of Michigan, find a business search. If the State regulatory agency doesn't find a company claim to be "In Good Standing", then why should this be allowed on Wikipedia as a fact? ICAAN, GSA, USPTO and other agencies are increasing activities to evaluate credibility. Wikipedia might always respect the regulatory authorities status over someone's webpage. The statement above that The Mechjock.com website takes precedence over Wikipedia should be reconsidered. Please visit MechJock.com. If someone claims to have purchased a company, it is an easy claim to validate with the regulatory agencies. It is an easy claim to cite with a realistic "news release" as required by Delaware regulatory agencies. Planet Hollywood did check out.

Virtual World Entertainment LLC has been a Delaware LLC since 1998 or so and anyone is welcome to pay the good people of Delaware for the certificate of good standing.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.152.47.50 (talk) 23:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BattleTech Centers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203170344/http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1999/jan99/fasapr.mspx to http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/1999/Jan99/FASApr.mspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:53, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated IP vandalism

As there seems to be repeated and ongoing edit wars between good-faith editors and the same few IP addresses, I reverted the page back to the last known good edit, and perhaps nominating it for protection. A sentient pickle (talk) 01:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]