Talk:Bexleyheath line

Trains: in UK / in London Low‑importance

	Trains Portal

	London Transport Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject London Transport (assessed as Low-importance).

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Map

Well done to all those that have converted the map into the latest template style. However, I foresee a problem, which is that the map now dominates the article. It seem to me to be a case of the "tail wagging the dog", so-to-speak. I have noticed that some pictures can be made smaller, a placed in a "frame", to make it fit nicely on the page. If one wants to look at an enlargement, then clicking the picture opens up a new window where the full-size picture can be looked at. I just wonder whether this might be a "solution" to the problem of the large map. Not sure how it might be implemented, but its the concept that I am trying to sell. Olana North (talk) 11:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the map would benefit from the removal of all turn-offs that are not serviced by trains on the line (for example Thameslink Line, Brighton Main Line). Stations that aren't serviced by any Bexleyheath line trains (e.g. Brixton, Clapham High Street) should especially go. Ironically, Cannon Street isn't shown as a separate station (just as a branch)! This was previously served during the morning peak (and maybe the evening one? I'm not sure), but is now served regularly even during the daytime off-peak. (After the evening peak only Charing Cross is served.) On that note the "Present services" section needs updating, but I don't know enough to do it (regarding the stations south of Dartford and looping back up to one of the other two nearby lines). Quietbritishjim (talk) 00:17, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:South Western Main Line which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]