Talk:Bitbird

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://mix247edm.com/bitbird-an-independent-labels-rise/

Soundcloud and Youtube plays

@Embryo Yall: Hello. I have recently noticed the Top 25 Soundcloud and Youtube plays section in this page, which appears to break multiple Wikipedia guidelines, with them being WP:NOTSTATS, WP:NOTPROMO, and WP:V. Firstly, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, thus song-play statistics which are unncessary and not notable are to NOT be added. It also seems to be promotional content, telling readers about how well a song is doing in plays, thus indirectly advertising the artists. And most importantly, the whole two sections are unreferenced, which makes it unverificable and of original research. Youtube videos can be linked, but Wikipedia asks for direct coverage from independant sources (Youtube is a primary source, and I doubt that many media outlets have covered every single song in those two sections).

Please justify the existence of those two sections, or I will have to remove it. Thank you. aNode (discuss) 04:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update (7 October 2018): Having seen the unrelated synthesis tag on the section, I still agree that all the songs should be removed. Despite having reliable sources attached to them all, I see no reason for having the top plays for each song here. WP:NOTSTATS comes up again, "Excessive listings of unexplained statistics. Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability, and articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context. Where statistics are so lengthy as to impede the readability of the article, the statistics can be split into a separate article and summarized in the main article." aNode (discuss) 16:47, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 6 October 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: procedural close. Nothing to do here. (page mover nac) Flooded with them hundreds 09:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bitbird → Bitbird – The lead itself states that Bitbird starts with a capital B, why is the title still in lowercase? No stylicisations please. aNode (discuss) 10:32, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If the title should not be in lower case then the {{Lowercase title}} should be removed. I'd say this is a reasonable venue to discuss this but it will show up as a malformatted request. Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, let's see where this discussion goes, and if it works out the lowercase title should indeed be removed. aNode (discuss) 16:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It follows in the lead that the lowercase b is simply a stylisation, which was recently discussed at Talk:Deadmau5. If that consensus holds, then {{Lowercase title}} should definitely be removed in this case. 99.203.31.232 (talk) 16:49, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my points at Talk:Deadmau5, and the move to Mau5trap. All-lowercase is a stylisation, gramatically incorrect, and must be removed per MOS:TMCAPS and MOS:TITLECAPS Lazz _R 15:41, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support stylism In ictu oculi (talk) 20:19, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Emma Sameth" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Emma Sameth. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Jalen Folf (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]