Jump to content

Talk:Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser III

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

comment

[edit]

why is this "Neo-Assyrian"? - Alsandro · T · w:ka: Th · T 07:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Layard

[edit]

I know Austen Layard is not the final word on this, but this article needs some citations from modern scholarship on some of the issues presented.Sweetmoose6 (talk) 01:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Significant

[edit]

"is historically significant because it displays the earliest ancient depiction of an Israelite". Really? Is this the only reason for the most complete Assyrian obelisk to be historically significant? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.94.62.57 (talk) 11:22, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Humri = Amorite?

[edit]

This source suggests some scholars disagree with the translation as Omri in favour of Amorites.

Reflections on Biblical Histories: A Revised Chronology, Robert N. Palmer, p173

Oncenawhile (talk) 15:19, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hoshea?

[edit]

Someone has changed all the references to Jehu to Hoshea, in this article and in one of the pictures. Can anyone explain? Oncenawhile (talk) 13:53, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]