Jump to content

Talk:Black Sea Shipyard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Names

[edit]

I need help with Cyrillic, Russian, and English. Also, we need Ukrainian.. chiefhuggybear (talk) 11:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English: Black Sea Shipyard
Russian: Черномор�?кий �?удо�?троительный завод (Chernomorskii sudostroitel'nyi zavod)
Ukrainian: Чорномор�?ький �?уднобудівельний завод (Chornomors'kii sudnobudіvel'nii zavod)
P.S. Thank you for the good article :)
~ Aleksandrit (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Aleksandrit for the information!! I still would like to do some cleanup to include consistent unit of measures and notations. I'd love to get some photographs of shipyard... this is an amazing facility with a great history...

chiefhuggybear (talk) 15:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Convert Template

[edit]

I am having a heck of a time getting the convert template to work for me. Can someone help? I need consistent units of measure and preferably in US spellings... Thanks ~ chiefhuggybear (talk) 22:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed them all to us spelling, and I found something about the "Nosenko Yard" here and here. —dima/talk/ 03:48, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's great! Thank you. Not sure what I was doing wrong but the sp=us wasn't working for me :-( Oh, well.. and thank you for the information about Nosenko Yard.. ~ chiefhuggybear (talk) 04:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/kuznetsov/
    Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:22, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Sea Shipyard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Black Sea Shipyard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does not exist anymore ...

[edit]

"The Black Sea Shipyard built all of the aircraft carrying ships of the USSR and Russia and continues to build large commercial ships."

Well, I wish that would be the case, but unfortunately the yard went bottom up and was liquidated - just google it, there are many reports. Now Ukraine is buying a lot of warships in various NATO countries. Should I mourn the loss of so much tradition in many industries because of cutting ties to Russia or should I mourn the fact that the West did not order anything as long as there was still capability in Ukraine ? Whatever, the result is obvious ... and should be represented here. R.I.P. JB. --92.195.30.148 (talk) 14:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then revise the text to say that it's out of business, using those links.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, after having been reverted by mighty WP Royalty once too often I only comment on Talk pages. It is just too frustrating when you worked to improve a page and then find things reverted and finally get told "Oh, I reverted you by habit as I do with all IPs", meaning just because I do not register an account. There are just too many people who believe that they own a certain topic or can decide which sources are valid and which are dubious. In this case the original reports are Russian and Ukrainian naturally, so that's a can of worms I'm not going to open. And nobody remains calm in controversy, it's all shouting and personal abuse. So whoever feels lucky ... go ahead. JB. --92.193.139.15 (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]