Talk:Bombay Time

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in October 2008.

Time Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 2 April 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved per request to Bombay Time Mike Cline (talk) 15:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bombay Time (time zone) → Bombay Time – No need for disambiguation - see discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombay Time PamD 16:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support. The required disambiguation can be handled by hat-notes. Btw the discussion could have continued at the AFD itself, and the closing admin would have implemented the consensus; but this is fine too. Abecedare (talk) 18:23, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support: The novel is barely mentioned on Wikipedia, with no detailed information provided and no indication of being especially noteworthy. The name of the newspaper is different, and I doubt that people looking for the newspaper would use "Time" instead of "Times" when looking for it. This leaves us with a WP:TWODAB situation that can be adequately handled with a hatnote. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
?? Support ... Oh, seriously? For a newspaper? Lol. Red Slash 23:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.