Talk:Bracket

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Perl (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Perl, a collaborative effort to write Perl programs for using and developing Wikipedia, share scripts, and improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Perl programming language. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
 
WikiProject Typography (Rated C-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
 


Crystallography[edit]

Crystallography uses these things to denote whether a plane or direction is being discussed, and whether it's generic or specific. I have put up a basic account of their use in Crystallography#Notation, but you may want to wait a few days for it to stabilize before you copy it into this article. This may also convince someone to finally flesh out Miller index.--Joel 06:14 & :18, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

Usage in chat[edit]

On chatrooms and message boards, actions are put in brackets.

"I know she can't sing, but I like Lindsay Lohan {ducks from flying vegetables}."

There's also the "Insert Item" usage.

"I don't care if [insert nominee here] deserves to be in the hall of fame, I think that Maris should be in."

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.172.165 (talk) 05:33 & :34, 6 November 2006

Braces[edit]

I've just reverted an anon editors claim that "curly bracket" is a colloquial term. I think this is an EngVar issue because, in the UK, "curly bracket" is much more common than "curly brace" (the exceptions being computer books published in the USA). What does anyone else think? I'd be happy to add a note that the use of "curly bracket" is deprecated in American English. Dbfirs 23:12, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

This is NOT an EngVar difference - as shown in the C Programming Language, C++ Programming language specifications. I did not cite the Java Language specification, or the C# language specification, but I could have because it is specified there also that these are "braces". Using "Bracket" or "Curly Bracket" for braces in these languages is *wrong*. I would show my references, but you deleted them! 74.194.78.21 (talk) 23:19, 24 January 2016 (UTC)'

I'd be happy with a note to this effect for the computer term, but this article is about a much wider usage. Dbfirs 23:28, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
I've restored your reference for the computing usage, with apologies for accidentally deleting it. Dbfirs 23:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Still think it needs cleanup, for example - the line that says "Such languages (C being one of the best-known examples) are therefore called curly bracket languages.[19]" points to a page that calls them braces, strangely enough. Every math page I've looked at has denoted they were called braces also. 74.194.78.21 (talk) 23:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
I agree it needs cleanup. American math pages will call then braces because of EngVar, but British maths pages call them curly brackets, and the OED says under bracket: "One of two marks of the form [ ] or ( ), and in mathematical use also {}, used for enclosing a word or number of words, a portion of a mathematical formula, or the like, so as to separate it from the context". I'll make a start on cleaning up. Dbfirs 00:08, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

In 20+ years working as a physicist and program manager in Silicon Valley, with hundreds of physicists, engineers, and mathematicians, and including numerous software development efforts, I never once heard anyone call a curly bracket a brace. Not once. "Pointy bracket", yes, very common. Brace, never. So, regardless of what appears in specs or math[s] pages -- and seriously does anyone really think humans talk like those sources? -- "brace" is not common usage here, or anywhere else in the US that a dealt with. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.213.71 (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bracket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bracket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)