Talk:Brute Force (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

List of Minecraft characters (4 participants)
Carlton Wilborn (4 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (3 participants; relisted)
TheoTown (12 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Article expansion

I've expanded the article quite a bit, but I think I left some spelling/grammer mistakes, if someonr could just go through and fix them iy would be greatly appriciated, also it would be good to have a more compleat story sectionShadoom1 07:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Hawk (a sexy-ass bitch with a large round ass and enormous, oversized tits) is suited to stealth"

Hardly Wikipedia quality level...

Heros/Bosses

Should the Leader bad guys be called Heros or Bosses, I prefer Boses as the only game that refers to them as Heros is Star Wars battle frount 2 Shadoom1 08:16, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The enemy leaders section should really be deleted as per policy. Ong elvin 14:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Boses, lol audio

Brute force is one of the worst games of all time, lets get some documentation on that. This is the ATARI pacman of the Xbox

i like brute force and dont biaserate this articleDappled Sage 02:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If your the one who thinks its a bad game, why don't you find some refrences for it? Shadoom 23:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brute Force (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930191932/http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/b/bruteforce/themakers.htm to http://www.xbox.com/en-US/games/b/bruteforce/themakers.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VG Article reassessment (24 September 2023)

This is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.

Category	Flag	Comments
Overall		The article generally meets the form of the manual of style but has minor issues, such as gaps in its content or missing elements, or requires greater editing to assist in clarity, balance and flow.
Layout	Y	The article has a layout with sections that conforms to all the foundational sections of the manual of style.
Lead section		The lead section mostly conforms with the manual of style, but the opening sentence misses key details and/or the paragraph does not summarize the content of the article.
Infobox	Y	The article contains an appropriate infobox.
Gameplay	Y	The article contains an accessible description of gameplay that minimizes jargon and avoids excessive trivial details.
Screenshot and cover art	Y	The article contains a screenshot and cover art for the game.
Plot		The article contains a plot section that may have issues, such as being incomplete or having excessive length, or an inappropriate tone.
Development	Y	The article contains a development section that is focused on the design and release of the game.
Reception		The article's reception section has issues, such as insufficient content, clutter in the section, overuse of direct quotations, undue weight or trivia.
Sources	Y	The article's content is consistently sourced by several independent reliable secondary sources that are cited correctly.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:14, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]