Talk:Bugis, Singapore

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles

Standard of article

I can't believe that this article has tons of images, and the quality is very poor. We don't need so many photos here. I think this needs a cleanup and also this is only talking about the gay stuff of Bugis Street, and does not cover anything else. --Ter e nc e Ong (恭喜发财) 03:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I formatted the images to make them smaller, and use <gallery>. Further cleanup is still warranted. --Vsion 05:41, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I happen to like the pictures! --GU-la-G

Give it time... Commenting about calling it "Boogie Street" origins from disco in the 1970s — my Australian and British relatives who knew it in the 1950s called it that as well. Julia Rossi 06:02, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BugisPeople001.jpg

Image:BugisPeople001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Song

Is there ANY evidence that Leonard Cohen was referring to Bugis Street in Singapore when he wrote THE SONG? Has he ever visited Lion City? This section seems to be a combination of folk etymology and jingoism.

Regarding the former, see www.worldwidewords.org which definitely places the origin of "bogeyman" or "bogey" in British Isles (bogle, boggart).

Regarding the latter, should we also assume "Land of Plenty" on the same album is about Singapore because it is a well-fed country with zero malnutrition?

I think this entire section should be cut (and similar note on Leonard Cohen page. At the least, indicate it is folk etymology "believed by some residents of Singapore" to qualify that it is NOT factual. Martindo (talk) 00:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! There is evidence. see Cohen's own writing at http://www.leonardcohen-prologues.com/boogie.htm Jamesdowallen (talk) 14:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

... Looking at the recent edit, I see that the page quoted that interview!!! Yet I see no claim the interview was fake. I'm reverting. Jamesdowallen (talk) 14:46, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted the edit without comment on Talk? Inappropriate. Jamesdowallen (talk) 09:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about, bro? The interview was real, but what makes you think Cohen was talking about Singapore? No evidence for that in the long quote. See Boogie page of WP if you want to understand what he was referring to, rather than be jingoistic about Singapore. Martindo (talk) 01:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Should not have moved the article

I don't know why people would move Bugis Street to Bugis, Downtown Core or Bugis, Singapore. Bugis Street is/was the famous street, if someone wants to create another article for the subzone, then do it, they should not have taken the article for Bugis Street. They are not the exact same subject, and given that the article is entirely about Bugis Street, it's wrong to use its content for Bugis, Singapore. I would suggest moving the article back, then create a separate article on Bugs, Singapore. Hzh (talk) 23:25, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]