Talk:Built to Spill Plays the Songs of Daniel Johnston

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateBuilt to Spill Plays the Songs of Daniel Johnston is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleBuilt to Spill Plays the Songs of Daniel Johnston has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 9, 2023Good article nomineeListed
August 5, 2023Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 22, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that indie rock band Built to Spill accompanied outsider musician Daniel Johnston at his final two concerts?
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Built to Spill Plays the Songs of Daniel Johnston/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tim O'Doherty (talk · contribs) 20:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


Nominator requested I review one of their GANs after kindly reviewing three of mine, which, now that I have returned from down south, will do. Review will come after I've taken a good look at the article. ChristieBot can be a bit slow, so pinging voorts now. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:20, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    Looks good, can't really nitpick any of it.
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Nothing bad, can't pick out anything wrong. Just had to add a full stop (or, given this article is written in AmE, a "period").
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    I don't know of the general reliability of some of the sources, but AGF; a lot are opinion pieces anyway, and are there to verify the quotations.
    c. (OR):
    No OR.
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
    Earwig gives 30.1%, which is a bit high but nothing alarming, given that it's mostly quotes and the name that it's picking up on.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Good'n'neutral, the reviews are weighed against each other equally.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    Fair use rationale on the one image looks fine to me.
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    No caption, but that's to be expected for articles on albums and songs.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:
    Well done to voorts and anybody else who worked on this article. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 20:46, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Voorts (talk) and 7szz (talk). Nominated by Voorts (talk) at 23:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Built to Spill Plays the Songs of Daniel Johnston; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough

Policy compliance:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: @Voorts: Good article. but, the personnel and track listing should be cited.

Hi @Onegreatjoke: generally, those sections generally do not need cites per WP:TRACKLIST and WP:PERSONNEL because it's assumed they're from the liner notes. However, I've now cited the liner notes. voorts (talk/contributions) 20:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC) Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:56, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Approve. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]