Talk:Bundle of His

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the heart.

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Medicine: Cardiology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Correct me if I'm wrong but I've noticed two inaccuracies:

1. Cardiac muscle is the only type of muscle that is myogenic. This is untrue. Other types of smooth muscle are capable of generating their own electrical impulses, namely the gastrointestinal system.

2. The term 'innervate' was used to describe the effect of purkinje fibres stimulating ventricular cells. 'Innervate' should only be used in the case of a neuron. Since purkinje fibres are not neuronal cells, this is not the correct term to use.

I'm only a first year Physiology student so I'm not sure if what I've said is accurate. Please comment.

Under Pathology, details on the clinical diagnosis of v-fib are perhaps unnecessary in an article about the bundle of His. Details about bundle-specific disorders like a third-degree block are still appropriate, however.

Bsrancho 23:33, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. --Arcadian 04:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm made the changes suggested by Bsrancho, except that I don't know what to say instead of "innervate". Yakushima (talk) 07:32, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

11/14/2010 1. Correct, changed to provide electrical conduction.

2. Also correct arteriolar diameter is also influenced by myogenic autoregulation

-PanchoVi

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bundle of His. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929080346/http://www.healthyheart.nhs.uk/heart_works/heart03.shtml to http://www.healthyheart.nhs.uk/heart_works/heart03.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:46, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]