Talk:CAP theorem

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Consistency here is not in the same sense as ACID consistency. ACID consistency is about transactions, this is about the differences of data between servers. Please fix.

I can disprove the theorem easily as it is worded in this article: a readonly distributed system. Note there was no requirement mentioned that the data in the distributed system changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aarnott (talkcontribs) 03:17, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Don't say "obviating the need for availability" -- just say "obviating availability."

To "obviate" means to "remove the need for." — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:43, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


I don't understand how the article can at the same time declare a certain assert a theorem in the lead section and then proceed to explain that that's not the proven assert. The formulation used by Seth Gilbert and Nancy Lynch needs to be presented as a theorem, and then the history section can contain the conjecture; or the article needs to be about the conjecture and proceed to explain what's actually the theorem. --Nemo 17:28, 24 July 2014 (UTC)


The "Brewer’s 2012 article" section is straight copy/paste from the 2012 IEEE article with no context. -- (talk) 02:46, 16 April 2015 (UTC)