Talk:Café Adria

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Café Adria article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Café Adria appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 September 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the nightclub Café Adria survived a hit by a Karl-Gerät siege mortar (pictured)?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Café Adria.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BorgQueen talk 19:59, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

The 60 centimetre shell which failed to explode

... that the nightclub Café Adria survived a hit by a Karl-Gerät siege mortar (pictured)?

Source: one of few interwar-era locations to survive the war, despite being hit by a bomb in 1944, which lodged in the basement but – miraculously – did not explode

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Jacques Lewis
Comment: This hook depends on the remarkable picture for its impact. If it doesn't get the picture slot then an ALT may work better. Something about the revolving dancefloor, perhaps. But I plan to add a picture of that too...

Created by Andrew Davidson (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 129 past nominations.

Andrew🐉(talk) 09:23, 25 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Hi Andrew Davidson, review follows: article created 19 August and exceeds minimum length; I am not familiar with the online sources used but look like they should be reliable (WhiteMAD looks to be a specialist architecture site and Note From Poland has an editorial board and policy); I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing from the two; a QPQ has been carried out; image is excellent, I am happy to AGF that it was published as stated on Commons in 1957 without a copyright notice which would render it PD; hook fact is interesting and stated in the article, it is covered by the MAD source but needs a citation immediately after the statement to comply with the DYK rules. I also think the clarification needed tag should be addressed before a main page appearance. Happy to review any ALT hooks you come up with, the revolving dancefloor sounds intriguing! - Dumelow (talk) 09:47, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What do we think of the statement on the Commons image page that the photo has been attributed by the Warsaw Rising Museum to being a different building in Napoleon Square? The link on the Commons page only goes to the Polish Wikipedia article for the museum - Dumelow (talk) 12:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dumelow: Which image? Can you link it and the relevant discussions? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:56, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jarekt loaded the image and wrote those details of its provenance. Perhaps he can tell us more.

To avoid the issue, I've changed that image to a similar one that is not disputed. The clarification tag has also been removed.

The revolving dancefloor can be seen 90 seconds into this evocative video. It would be good to take a section of footage and turn it into a gif which shows it revolving but that would be technically complex and might not work well on the main page.

Andrew🐉(talk) 09:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, replacement image looks to be OK. I've duplicated the ref after the hook fact as required by the DYK rules - Dumelow (talk) 12:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]