Jump to content

Talk:California Pacific Airlines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

flycpair.com

[edit]
Resolved
 – Link long-since changed to proper website

This page cannot be a copy of http://www.flycpair.com - Look at the page. There's no text on this one - It's just a large image map. WhisperToMe (talk) 12:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Should we merge Aerodynamics Inc. into this article, now that it is owned by California Pacific Airlines? Mirza Ahmed (talk) 04:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

California Pacific Airlines is "operated by" Aerodynamics Inc.. I would suggest not to merge based on the idea that California Pacific Airlines is the brand that is being operated by a "subsidiary carrier". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.250.181 (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be better to merge it into Great Lakes Airlines instead, which already has a section on Aerodynamics, Inc. that could be expanded upon. Otherwise, I think that this company may be non-noteworthy enough for deletion outright. Also, it seems that the name Aerodynamics Inc. has been discontinued by Cal Pacific, who are now just operating the EAS flights under their own brand, so they needn't be more than a footnote on this page. Specter Koen (talk) 14:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

History

[edit]

The history section strikes me as being way too long for a small, recently-started airline. Can we prune it, or perhaps, create a separate article for the history? Mirza Ahmed (talk) 15:53, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and I shortened it considerably. Please tell me if you think the new version is acceptable. Specter Koen (talk) 14:35, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]